Mark @ Everlast
Advertiser
There is one point of discussion here that needs to be mentioned, and is part of every course of Welding 101. (or whatever bonafied course on welding is taught.)
This is the fact there is a difference in a weld with defects and a defective weld. This is a balancing argument when discussing proper weld technique, and allowable defects. Nearly every weld ever made has some sort of quantifiable defect. These defects may be major or minor. Or it may contain a series of minor defects. But these defects do not have to appreciably affect strength. Of course they do have at least some impact, ever how measurable on strength. But over time there have been millions if not billions or trillions of welds tested, and tried. There are rooms full of researched data. And we are at a point where we can take a look at weld defects to determine if they constitute a defective weld. A tiny bit of slag trapped (inclusion) in a weld does not make a defective weld. But you get more than a certain amount, they will. A weld not welded at a high enough amperage or over a prescribed amperage can categorically be described as a defective weld if discovered because the results of such poor technique are known. An arc strike in some situations outside of the weld area can cause minute cracking under even mild pressure! This is an automatic DQ in many tests. But the tests aren't heartless. They do allow a measureable amount of inclusions and tears etc in a test. They results don't have to be perfect to pass. But in this case, NONE of the welds come close. I've literally have seen better welds from a first week welding student as far tests go. I don't mean to throw off on this test. Not by a long shot. I too am interested in the capability of a 120V machine. But in this case, it was a welding FAIL...pure and simple. Too much controversy has been created though, and I think this proves that there is a great chasm in understanding from what is classified as a good or workable weld. Just because the someone thinks that the weld would not leave pieces of trailer in the road, if that were an axle hanger, I can bet that it would have probably jacknifed the vehicle in the road, and flipped down the interstate at some point.
Keep in mind a weld does not have to experience catastrophic failure to create danger or other failures. One weak link breaks the chain, right? So what if the rest are good? If you have more than one weak link, well...go ahead and use your it to hoist a stump your head with your tractor front end loader and stand under it. That will teach the important difference between weld defects and a defective weld and what you will and won't trust in the future.
This is the fact there is a difference in a weld with defects and a defective weld. This is a balancing argument when discussing proper weld technique, and allowable defects. Nearly every weld ever made has some sort of quantifiable defect. These defects may be major or minor. Or it may contain a series of minor defects. But these defects do not have to appreciably affect strength. Of course they do have at least some impact, ever how measurable on strength. But over time there have been millions if not billions or trillions of welds tested, and tried. There are rooms full of researched data. And we are at a point where we can take a look at weld defects to determine if they constitute a defective weld. A tiny bit of slag trapped (inclusion) in a weld does not make a defective weld. But you get more than a certain amount, they will. A weld not welded at a high enough amperage or over a prescribed amperage can categorically be described as a defective weld if discovered because the results of such poor technique are known. An arc strike in some situations outside of the weld area can cause minute cracking under even mild pressure! This is an automatic DQ in many tests. But the tests aren't heartless. They do allow a measureable amount of inclusions and tears etc in a test. They results don't have to be perfect to pass. But in this case, NONE of the welds come close. I've literally have seen better welds from a first week welding student as far tests go. I don't mean to throw off on this test. Not by a long shot. I too am interested in the capability of a 120V machine. But in this case, it was a welding FAIL...pure and simple. Too much controversy has been created though, and I think this proves that there is a great chasm in understanding from what is classified as a good or workable weld. Just because the someone thinks that the weld would not leave pieces of trailer in the road, if that were an axle hanger, I can bet that it would have probably jacknifed the vehicle in the road, and flipped down the interstate at some point.
Keep in mind a weld does not have to experience catastrophic failure to create danger or other failures. One weak link breaks the chain, right? So what if the rest are good? If you have more than one weak link, well...go ahead and use your it to hoist a stump your head with your tractor front end loader and stand under it. That will teach the important difference between weld defects and a defective weld and what you will and won't trust in the future.