westcliffe01
Veteran Member
The partial frontal always yields more damage and due to driver flinch is also more common.
Why not crash them dead center?
Why not crash them dead center?
The partial frontal always yields more damage and due to driver flinch is also more common.
Can anyone guess what is so unique about the 1963 (or so) Chrysler Imperial?
I would like to see the 09 impala go against a 74 chevy impala with the 200 lb factory front bumper. I think the 09 would have fit in the trunk of the 74 after the crash test.
I was a crash test dummy in a 1996 Pontiac Bonneville that was hit head on by a young lady driving a 1972 Impala. It ripped the seatbelt anchors out of the door of the Bonneville door and put my head through the windshield top post.
As I understand (from pictures I have seen online) the 69 had the framerail in line with the steering wheel. That is about where the '09 hit. From what I saw the '09 hit about 50/50 while the '59 hit 40/60. That would tend to bias the test in favor of the '09 which has a transverse mounted engine. In face, a car with a transverse mounted engine will tend to do much better in a offset crash than a car with a longituidally mounted engine (being as the transverse engine will act to spread the force of the impact across the front of the car).Crashing them dead center would be a more accurate comparison of damage. They crashed the 09's frame rail into the 59's fender. They should have at least crashed them frame rail to frame rail.
Crashing them dead center would be a more accurate comparison of damage. They crashed the 09's frame rail into the 59's fender. They should have at least crashed them frame rail to frame rail.
This was not a crash test. They went into it with an agenda and the results came out the way they wanted. If these new cars are so tough, then why do the old cars cream them in demolition derbys? Can anyone guess what is so unique about the 1963 (or so) Chrysler Imperial?
Glad to hear you are still around to talk about it Dargster. The 72's are big, but the 73 to 76 GM fullsizes are some of the toughest cars out there, especialy the leaf spring wagons with the power tailgate. The 74 chevy impala is a favorite with the demo derby crowd due to the nearly indestructable front bumper, followed by the 73 to 76 buicks for the tough front clips.
I was a crash test dummy in a 1996 Pontiac Bonneville that was hit head on by a young lady driving a 1972 Impala. It ripped the seatbelt anchors out of the door of the Bonneville door and put my head through the windshield top post.
Crashing them dead center would be a more accurate comparison of damage. They crashed the 09's frame rail into the 59's fender. They should have at least crashed them frame rail to frame rail.
If you view the overhead view at ~ 1:38 into the clip, each cars fender is approximately at the others centerline. No glancing blows!
I read where the big 3 ( That was a long time ago!) complained about this test because it inflicted huge amounts of damage making their product look bad. However the Insurance Institute stood behind this test because this scenario occured often as last minute avoidance / preservation manouvers make a square on head on hit like the goverment ratings tests rare.
This video is just intended to highlight the improvements made in the auto safety field. Notice the steering wheel drive back and whack the dummy of the 59 chevy for instance. Collapsible shafts are now mandatory.
No Conspiracys here.