As a 1st time buyer of a compact tractor, I'd appreciate your opinions about these 2 tractor choices. Initially I'd buy it with a FEL, snowblower, cab and brushhog. The main items I'll be doing are brushhoging 4 to 5 cleared acres 2 to 3 times a year, maintaining an existing fire trail on the property and snowplowing 2 200' driveways, 1 dirt and 1 paved. I'll use the FEL to do all those projects I've put off over the years.
Some of the questions I have are:
1. I'm assuming either one will take care of my main uses. Am I right?
2. Will I be dissapointed with the manual LB1914 since I'm use to a hydrostatic lawn tractor?
3. My fields are not the smoothest and my back is not like it was years ago. Is there a noticeable difference in comfort between the 2?
4. The HP for the PTO is 17.1 on the LB1914 but only 15.5 on the CK20HST. How important is that?
5. The spec sheet for the LB1914 doesn't show a mid PTO. I don't anticipate needing it now but if I did, am I reading it correctly?
Prices for a tractor w/FEL are 14,000 for the CK20HST and the LB1914 is 12,500 new or 11,000 for one with approx 250hrs. Do these look right?
Thanks in advance for your comments,
Bob
Some of the questions I have are:
1. I'm assuming either one will take care of my main uses. Am I right?
2. Will I be dissapointed with the manual LB1914 since I'm use to a hydrostatic lawn tractor?
3. My fields are not the smoothest and my back is not like it was years ago. Is there a noticeable difference in comfort between the 2?
4. The HP for the PTO is 17.1 on the LB1914 but only 15.5 on the CK20HST. How important is that?
5. The spec sheet for the LB1914 doesn't show a mid PTO. I don't anticipate needing it now but if I did, am I reading it correctly?
Prices for a tractor w/FEL are 14,000 for the CK20HST and the LB1914 is 12,500 new or 11,000 for one with approx 250hrs. Do these look right?
Thanks in advance for your comments,
Bob