driver444 said:I have a 2015 gear drive with filled tires.
filled tires make ALL the difference in the world.
art said:Weight on the rear makes all the difference in the world and the best weight is not liquid filled tires!
When you make a mistake with them it costs more then steel and a tractor doesn't perform as well with liquid!
tractorErnie said:Art could you please give us a little more insight on this ?
Maybe im missing something![]()
Thank You Ernie
Wouldn't the center of gravity actually be the same for equal weight added: wheel weights (or weight box at axle centerline height) vs. filled tires assuming uniformly distributed foam and not half-filled liquid?bindian said:Filled tires definitely have a lower CG over add on weights.
The correct procedure is to add weight on each end depending on how far the added weight is from the CG. But to figure that out you need to be up on your weight and balance formulas.Dougster said:Wouldn't the center of gravity actually be the same for equal weight added: wheel weights (or weight box at axle centerline height) vs. filled tires assuming uniformly distributed foam and not half-filled liquid?
Dougster
I see you are thinking CG in two (or three) planes while I am thinking in one. I was thinking vertical plane, rear tires only and filled with foam which I thought distributed itself evenly... and therefore had the same net effect on CG as rear wheel weights of the same total weight.bindian said:The correct procedure is to add weight on each end depending on how far the added weight is from the CG. But to figure that out you need to be up on your weight and balance formulas.The lower (in height) the weight is attached, the less top heavy the tractor is and thus has more stability for traction. Half or more (depending on how full) of a filled tire's weight is below the axle keeping the tractor bottom heavy where it counts for traction. Front bumper weights or 3PH weights are at or above the axle height. If they are lower you have overhang problems. Wheel weights would then be the next best thing to filled tires. Best thing to do is go with what your manual says.
hugs, Brandi
From my experience, it doesn't seem like you need near as much weigh if you use cast compared to fluid. Something like 400 lbs. of cast vs. 6-700 lbs. of fluid ballast. It isn't scientific, just seat of the pants.art said:Sorry I missed you guys. The steel weights on wheels is just as good as the liquid and you can get by with less because it doesn't hinder the tire flex which is what actually hurts traction.
To say the liquid is better because it is lower I question the differerence, both steel and liquid still use the same shaft or axle to attach to the tractor. To use a three point hitch weight does remove load from the front axle using the rear axle as a pivot.
MtnViewRanch said:This has been my experience with my 7520, tractor by itself okay, added 4 sets of wheel weights, okay just a little better,but not enough. Added fluid to all 4 tires per owners manual, oh my goodness, I could hardly believe the difference.
Not only does it seem much more stable, but I feel like the tractor actually rides smoother.
![]()
I guess that my tractor weighs in around 12,000 lbs with the FEL, I still need rear weight on the 3ph when picking up maximum loads and even with all that weight, I still can stop the tractor with all of my grading implements and they are 81"- 96" wide.
Just some of my experiences, yours may vary.![]()
art said:I'd say your air presssure was off to begin with, I've never seen what you described for peformance. To have a loaded front tire is way over loaded for all but total heavy earth movement day in and out.
From the photos I have seen of MtnViewRanch............you are describing Brian's operation.art said:To have a loaded front tire is way over loaded for all but total heavy earth movement day in and out.