2320 &2520 Is their a difference?

[aesanders]

The main difference from my standpoint would be the ability to use larger mowers. If you do want a 72" mower then get the 2520. The 2320 will only handle a 60" finish mower and 48" rotary mower while the 2520 will handle one foot bigger each. Also as noted the hydraulics are faster. This was no big deal for me as I will only put 100-200 hours a year on my machine for various chores and the hydraulic speed would only net me an hour or so savings per year. If I planned on using it daily for extened periods of time then this would be a much larger issue, but those days are behind me.

For my 6 acres, I can easly take care of it with the 2320. The motor is planty capable and has plenty power for this small a machine. This was the smallest tractor I have ever owned and so far I like it very well. While it is no match for some of the full size Backhoes I use to have, it does take care of my property nicely and that is what I bought it for.

 

[Chris2520]

I agree completely. if you happy with a 2320 , thats all that matters.
everyone always wants to compair machines to see witch will do what.
and it dont matter as long a the person is happy with there choice. I bought a 2520 , cause it was the most powerful machine in its size JD offered. most people are completely happy with there 2305. because it fits there needs.
i would imagine the 2305 JD sells alot more of them than any other compact tractor. it just was not quite large enough for me at this time. like you. later , after i get certain projects done. i may feel differently.....

 

[HD4010]

To the newbies...

I don't have experience with either of the new machines but it's an interesting read. I went through similar questions only between a 4010 and 4100. I already had the 4010 and thought I could pick up a used low hour 4100 and sell my 4010 and be about even. The main reasons for wanting the 4100 were hydraulic flow (5.x on the 4100 and 3.4 on the 4010), higher operating pressure on the hydraulics, full position control on the 3 point, and 3 hp on the PTO.

I picked up a 4100 and found out in the end that the 4010 actual suited my needs better. The main reason being that the 4010 has a lower center of gravity and is much more stable on the slopes I have to cut.

I love the 4100 for it's hydraulic flow. The loader really cycles a lot faster on this machine. I mention this because the 2520 has the same flow as the 4100 and the 2230 has the same as the 4010. But in the end, I'm going to sell it because I can't justify having two of these things around.

Just my opinion, but in terms of power, the 4100 is 20 and the 4010 is 18.5. I can't see where you really can use the extra power that the new line of tractors has. I run a 54inch deck and a PTO trac vac on my 18.5 hp 4010 and the only want for more power is when I'm going up hill with a full load of wet leaves in the trailer behind me (500+- pounds). Just my opinion but torque is the real number talk about. I would think that anything more than the 4100 has is in this size range is overkill. From a power standpoint, I don't think you will ever run out with any of the new line of tractors.

Good Luck and remember, it about what you need what you think you might want...

 

[ducati996]

That's an interesting change from the 2520-2320 predecessors the 4115-4110 series. There the 4110 had two pumps like the 4115, I believe. I guess they beefed up the 4115 to get the 2350 and slimmed down the 4110 to get the 2320. Or maybe they just droped the 4110 version and the 2320 is more like the 4010. Very confusing all around when they change out the lineup.

Cliff

Thats the rub - the 2320 is not a direct replacement for the 4100 -4110 because of that limited flow rating. The 4100 & 4110, 4115 had both 5.1 gpm for the implement 2.3 for the steering and dual pumps. All were solid machines

Trust me its very noticable - and annoying

 

[ducati996]

To the newbies...

I don't have experience with either of the new machines but it's an interesting read. I went through similar questions only between a 4010 and 4100. I already had the 4010 and thought I could pick up a used low hour 4100 and sell my 4010 and be about even. The main reasons for wanting the 4100 were hydraulic flow (5.x on the 4100 and 3.4 on the 4010), higher operating pressure on the hydraulics, full position control on the 3 point, and 3 hp on the PTO.

I picked up a 4100 and found out in the end that the 4010 actual suited my needs better. The main reason being that the 4010 has a lower center of gravity and is much more stable on the slopes I have to cut.

I love the 4100 for it's hydraulic flow. The loader really cycles a lot faster on this machine. I mention this because the 2520 has the same flow as the 4100 and the 2230 has the same as the 4010. But in the end, I'm going to sell it because I can't justify having two of these things around.

Just my opinion, but in terms of power, the 4100 is 20 and the 4010 is 18.5. I can't see where you really can use the extra power that the new line of tractors has. I run a 54inch deck and a PTO trac vac on my 18.5 hp 4010 and the only want for more power is when I'm going up hill with a full load of wet leaves in the trailer behind me (500+- pounds). Just my opinion but torque is the real number talk about. I would think that anything more than the 4100 has is in this size range is overkill. From a power standpoint, I don't think you will ever run out with any of the new line of tractors.

Good Luck and remember, it about what you need what you think you might want...

I disagree with what you mention -
Luckily I have experience with the following models - 4100, 2320, 2520...
The PTO power difference between the 4100 and 4010 is significant enough - I think its 14 HP (4010) vs 17 HP (4100), and 20.5 (2520).
Those are significant differences that you will notice and feel. Low end torque is key here, and the winners are both the 4100 and of course the 2520. You can do loader work all day long in the 1500-1800 RPM range and have full flow and hydrolic power. I assure you the 2520 is more powerful in lifting ability over the 4100 - My 4100 was no slouch either, but it didnt lift as much as the 2520. Pulling power is also the 2520 strong point.

Hope this helps

Duc

 

[HD4010]

I wasn't doing a comparison between the 2xxx series and the 4000 series, I was trying to point out that the best tractor may not necessarily be the one with the best numbers, but rather the one that feels the best to the operator while meeting his needs.

As you point out, there is 3 hp difference between PTO HP between the 4100 and 4010 with the 4010 only having 14. While the number may seem low when your looking numbers in on paper or in an email, my point is that even though it's only 14, the wimpy little 4010 still has enough power for my needs while running 2 implements at the same time. While it's torque number in comparison to the 2510, 2320 4100, etc may be low relatively, in real world operation it is ample. By the way I also run a 60 inch tiller with it.

As far as loader operation I was pointing out that from a flow standpoint the 4010 is comparable to the 2320 and the 4100 is comparable to the 2520 and that I can see a big difference in cycle times between the two. I'm actually disappointed that the 2320 doesn't have the 5.1 flow because this would really make it a nice tractor. It certainly has the HP to suppor that flow. I guess it's marketing?

In terms of lifting power, given that the 2520 and 4100 have the same hydraulic flow and I believe they operate at the same pressure, as assuming they both have the 200CX loader, the performance would have to be identical. I could see where real world performance could be different given that they may be weighted diffently, etc.

HD

 

[HD4010]

oops, don't want to offend anyone. I didn't mean that the 2320 isn't a nice tractor, just that I would like a tractor with the 5.1 flow, full position control on the 3 point and separate lift for the MMM and I want to keep the machine a little smaller. So with the 5.1 flow I think the 2320 would be just right. For my needs, I think the 2520 is getting a bit on the big side.

But they both sure are beautiful machines aren't they?
HD

 

[ducati996]

In terms of lifting power, given that the 2520 and 4100 have the same hydraulic flow and I believe they operate at the same pressure, as assuming they both have the 200CX loader, the performance would have to be identical. I could see where real world performance could be different given that they may be weighted diffently, etc.

HD

I understand and know what you were trying to say - I have no problem either way. Just so you know even though on paper or by reason of logical conclusions, the 200CX specifications have the 2520 being more capable than the 4110 (4100 replacement). Dont feel bad, I think they also list the 2305 has being more capable than the 4100-4110 (impossible) Overall Deere has done itself an absolute disservice to itself and certainly has hurt its sales because of incorrect specifications. If they actually reflected real world performance, it would certainly have the 2520 better matched with its competitors by matching their performance. Looks at the spec's below and you will see the junk they post - They list the 2305 with more flow - and almost the same lift as the 4110 - those are just a few examples, many more

Select Product

 

[Chris2520]

Thats right Duc , but we know better dont we.....

 

[ducati996]

Thats right Duc , but we know better dont we.....

Nothing like real world evaluations to prove/disprove perceptions

Geesh - I hate sounding like a broken record on this subject -wish Deere would just fix it already

Duc