Poster: glennmac
Subject: Re: 2nd Impressions: Kubota
B2910 vs. JD 4200
> Hook, I have 11 acres. I finish mow 3 and brush cut
> about 3 or 4. Mowing and cutting is what I do and will
> continue to do most.
This is pretty similar to my propety/needs.
> To me, the 4300 (actually 4400) is the tractor I would buy
> now if I had it to do all over again--except for five things.
> I, like many people who have selected Kubotas over JDs,
> think that (1) the Kubota hydro is smoother and better,
I have very little time on any tractors, but they felt equivalent to me.
> (2) the Kubota pedals are easier to press and less jerky,
No argument about the pedals being easier to press on the Kubota.
> (3) the Kubota control layout is better,
Ignoring the pedals, I agree with this.
> (4) the Kubota engine is quieter and smoother, and
Maybe something was wrong with the
B2910 I drove, but it was noisier than the JD.
> (5) the Kubotas have been much more problem free and
> reliable than the JD 4000 series.
I have no experience withn this (of course), but I believe it, given my experience with cars & motorcycles (my cars are Sweidsh & Japanese, my cruiser is Japanese).
> These things would, and do, deter me from buying a JD.
> But that's just my opinion, much of which is subjective.
> If, however, those things werent negatives to me--or were
> even positives, as they seem to be to you--I would buy the
> 43/4400 over the 2910 because I like the size and the
> attachment designs better. I wouldnt consider the 4200.
Because you think it's underpowered?
> You cannot expect the Kubota and JD to be the same
> price; they are different products.
Yes, but they are both viable alternatives for the same jobs.
> I think JDs are more expensive in most parts of the country.
> I wouldnt let $1500 stop me from getting the 4300.
Sigh ... as I said in a previous post, when I started all of this, I was looking at at
BX2200 ... maybe $13K with all of the attachments. Now I'm considering maybe $21K. Are you sure this web site isn't sponsored by the tractor manufacturers?
> You have to think of a tractor and implements as being in
> the nature of a vehicle purchase, pricewise--$15000 to
> $30000 for decent one. But unlike, and better, than a car,
> a tractor can literally last you the rest of you life, and still
> have a decent residual value. Think of that $1500 as being
> prorated over that time frame. It's worth it for the extra
> engine and hydraulic power of the 4300, and you'll be able
> to attach larger backhoes and pull larger implements on
> your acreage.
More to think about ...
> If you go the 3ph mower route instead of belly mower,
> which is another key decision you have to make, the
> maneuverability among 27-45 hp tractors is almost
> irrelevant.
I've given this a lot of thought & decided to go with the MMM, since I do have some non-trivial maneuvering to do around trees, bushed, etc.
Thanks for the note.
Hook