422 versus 425

[BobRip]

I have an early 422 (year 2000). I love the machine, but my biggest complaint is wheel motor torque. I have gotten stuck in places where the extra torque would have pulled me out. I have actually considered upgrading the wheel motors. In about 5 years I will probably buy a 425 for this reason. I have a ROPS on my machine and highly recommend it for safety and sun reasons.
If your property is flat and even the extra torque is not as needed, but it still helps when pushing dirt. My property has many ruts and a swamp.

I live near Richmond Va. (actaully Powhatan county). You are welcome to try out my machine and attachments if you like.

Bob Rip

 

[BobRip]

I heard a number of 50% more powerful wheel motors instead of 30%. Does anyone really know.

Bob Rip

 

[Phil_VA]

pairodime - Thanks for the links. I had looked back about a year and hadn't seen anything. Looks like I should have gone a couple of weeks further!

BobRip - Thanks for the response and the offer. I suppose if I was going as far as Richmond I would probably make a trip to the factory, but much appreciated.

- Phil

 

[FOURTEEN]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Is there anyone on the board that regretted getting the 422 and thought they should have gone with the 425!)</font>


<font color="red"> I got the PT-425 and have never regretted spending the extra $2000. (The $500 for the ROPS in mandatory!)!! Most things about the PT-425 I consider minimal, and anything less would be marginal or inadaquate!

It is like "Should I get a Honda or an Acura?"! The Honda will do the job, but the similar Acura is just plain better in most respects!

A tractor is most likely a long term investment. Over time the extra money isn't much. You will be using your PT for nearly every job that you do outside, and when you mount your PT, you want to be able to say to yourself "

Boy, this is great!", rather than "

Gee, maybe I should have gotten ........!!".

Get the best you can afford!
/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
</font>

 

[MossRoad]

The reason we went with a PT425 over a PT422 back in 2001 was simple... I like to get the largest powerplant available. Back in 2001, there weren't as many differences. They were identical except for the engine and ROPS. Today, they are quite different, with the steering rams, length, lift height, wheel motors, engine and ROPS. If faced with the choice today, I would still go with the PT425 for our needs.

 

[FOURTEEN]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( The reason we went with a PT425 over a PT422 back in 2001 was simple... I like to get the largest powerplant available. I would still go with the PT425 for our needs. )</font>


<font color="red"> Me too!! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif Also, the nice Kohler engine /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif rather than the ....... Oops, /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif sorry, /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif that's no longer a valid reason!! /forums/images/graemlins/mad.gif /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif</font>

 

[BobRip]

In my opinion two cylinders will put less stress on the structure than one. The unsymetrical forces with one cylinder will put more forces on the joints between the machine halves. Rather than the machine just pivoting on the joint (with on cylinder pulling and the other pushing), the joint will take the force of steering. I fail to see how this could be a good thing. My engineering experience says that making things symmetrical eliminates a lot of problems. The one steering cylinder is something new for PT and I am not sure they have enough experience with doing this. People have broken one of the joints (very rarely) and this will not help. If your land is flat and you are not one to force a machine, it's probably going to be fine. I am an electron pusher by trade, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

Bob Rip

 

[Marks481]

SOmeone who bought a 422 recently said that his had two cylinders.

Has someone who has bought a 422 or has been to Tazewell recently provided a reliable report that there is only one steering cylinder?

I wish that Power Trac provided a better description on their website of the features of their tractors (including some high res pictures... I learned more about their tractors ging to Mossroad's site). Doubly so since you can't just walk into a local dealership to look at one.

 

[BobRip]

I thought only the 418 had one steering cylinder. My old 422 has two steering cylinders.

Get the 425, it's the sweet spot of Power Trac machines. One of the sales guys at PT told me that when the 422 were sold to professionals, after about two years they would come back and complain about wheel motor torque. The same complaint that I have. I expect this is one of the reasons that they recently upgraded the wheel motors.

Bob Rip

 

[FOURTEEN]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Get the 425, it's the sweet spot of Power Trac machines.

<font color="red"> For sure!! Best compromise of power, weight, capacity, size, ability, and price for most people doing most jobs!! </font>



One of the sales guys at PT told me that when the 422 were sold to professionals, after about two years they would come back and complain about wheel motor torque. The same complaint that I have. I expect this is one of the reasons that they recently upgraded the wheel motors.

<font color="red"> Even the 425 comes no where near having too much wheel power. It is adequate for most jobs, but I haven't been able to spin a tire on any surface, and when it faces an obstruction, or too much resistance, it just stops!! Never have to worry about chewing up the lawn or driveway!! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif Like I said, it is no bulldozer!! /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif</font>

Bob Rip )</font>