422 vrs 425

   / 422 vrs 425 #21  
2deeskip said:
My reasons for rulling out the 422 have been stated and revolve around the lower rated motors, lack of standard rops, lift height, etc.

Skip

Good decision.
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #22  
2deeskip said:
Toy; I don't think they have made this thing for years. It has to be old as the master cylinder crossed to a mid fifties chevy truck. I haven't been able to find any info for this machine anywhere. There are no ID plates on it other than the transaxle has a manuf. name plate, I believe it is Haxco. I know of one other, that is owned by a church camp & I was told it was donated to them. A reletive who sells Stiener machines was trying to repair it for them, but I haven't seen it.
My reasons for rulling out the 422 have been stated and revolve around the lower rated motors, lack of standard rops, lift height, etc.

Skip
Its good that you look at both machines and determine what the differences are and is the differences worth the extra money. When I bought mine my wife insisted on the rops no matter which one I got so that would be an added cost for the ones that don't have one and reduces the difference in cost between the two at the time I bought mine I had the money for the 422 so I borrowed the extra to upgrade to the 425[hint that way you can get it sooner] .
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #23  
2deeskip said:
As requested I am posting photos


Interesting unit!! What do you use it for? How old is it? Does it go in snow?



PS: For future reference:
It is best to 'Crop' your pictures to just show the relevant object, such as the tractor, and eliminate background, such as the lawn and the woods. Then 'Resize' the picture to no more than 800 wide and 200 KB.

In this case, I easily edited your picture to 800 x 441 and only 92.7 KB, making it easier to view and much faster to download.
 

Attachments

  • My TruckThing 001  EDIT  .jpg
    My TruckThing 001 EDIT .jpg
    92.8 KB · Views: 281
   / 422 vrs 425 #24  
I'd like to bring this one back up to the top if anyone is game...

Bob in this thread you seem to have recommended the 425 like your dissatisfied with your 422. I know without a doubt the 425 is a great machine. I also know the plus's of owning one. Not trying to start anything here. Would just like to hear your experiences (422 owners.) :rolleyes:

Has anyone changed there mind on their 422 ? How satisfied are you with your particular choice. If you bought the same machine again, any advice as what to look for or not to look for?

I may be upgrading this spring / summer, I've been seriously thinking of getting a new 422. I know there are used units out there in the 425 model. I just have a very hard time convincing myself to buy used. I wouldn't enjoy it as much, always wondering if the machine had been abused or neglected that's just the way I think. :confused:

On another note, how much do the high torque wheel motors cost? How labor intensive are they to install? Say if I wanted to upgrade later on. Anyone know?? :eek:
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #25  
I have never "wanted" a 425 due to the lack of anything that the 422 does (or does not do) with the exception of the additional lift height. A makeshift ramp of some sort has always solved that problem! Sure, additional engine hp or wheel torque would be nice to have but lacking those features has yet to stop me from doing what I intended this tractor to do at purchase time.
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #26  
Barryh said:
I'd like to bring this one back up to the top if anyone is game...

Bob in this thread you seem to have recommended the 425 like your dissatisfied with your 422. I know without a doubt the 425 is a great machine. I also know the plus's of owning one. Not trying to start anything here. Would just like to hear your experiences (422 owners.) :rolleyes:

Has anyone changed there mind on their 422 ? How satisfied are you with your particular choice. If you bought the same machine again, any advice as what to look for or not to look for?

I may be upgrading this spring / summer, I've been seriously thinking of getting a new 422. I know there are used units out there in the 425 model. I just have a very hard time convincing myself to buy used. I wouldn't enjoy it as much, always wondering if the machine had been abused or neglected that's just the way I think. :confused:

On another note, how much do the high torque wheel motors cost? How labor intensive are they to install? Say if I wanted to upgrade later on. Anyone know?? :eek:

Barry, I think you were refering to me. There are places where I have been stuck on my property when it is wet that the extra wheel motor torque would help. Initially I got stuck often, until I learned how to steer left and right (PT wiggle) to get out. Also I carry a winch.

I have considered the more powerful wheel motors, but my machine does not have the third hose for case drain and I might have to add those. Also PT uses a larger tram pump on the 425. Basically I am waiting till my present machine is 10 years old and will then give myself a new machine. Not because I really need it, but what the heck, I am not getting any younger and the cost is not that great. Also I am hoping that PT will make an even better machine by then. I am also considering getting the 1430 instead, but buying all new attachment does not appeal to me.

The new 422 does not have two steering cylinders and this bothers my goal for symmetry. I think failures have been few, but it's another strike against a 422.

I am an engineer and am never completley satisfied with anything, but if I had to live with the 422 for the rest of my life, it would not be a give deal. I have accomplished a lot with the 422 and it has been a reliable machine for me. Probably more fun per dollar than anything I have bought in the past 20 years. My hills, ruts, and mud do create issues sometimes. If you don't have a lot of either the 422 is probably a good choice.

Barry, as much as you have used the 180, go for the 425. You are not a casual user and need that capability. I wonder if the 180 and the 422 have the same wheel motors. If so you may find that you have less relative torque. Check on this with PT.
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #27  
BobRip said:
Barry, I think you were refering to me. There are places where I have been stuck on my property when it is wet that the extra wheel motor torque would help. Initially I got stuck often, until I learned how to steer left and right (PT wiggle) to get out. Also I carry a winch.

I have considered the more powerful wheel motors, but my machine does not have the third hose for case drain and I might have to add those. Also PT uses a larger tram pump on the 425. Basically I am waiting till my present machine is 10 years old and will then give myself a new machine. Not because I really need it, but what the heck, I am not getting any younger and the cost is not that great. Also I am hoping that PT will make an even better machine by then. I am also considering getting the 1430 instead, but buying all new attachment does not appeal to me.

The new 422 does not have two steering cylinders and this bothers my goal for symmetry. I think failures have been few, but it's another strike against a 422.

I am an engineer and am never completley satisfied with anything, but if I had to live with the 422 for the rest of my life, it would not be a give deal. I have accomplished a lot with the 422 and it has been a reliable machine for me. Probably more fun per dollar than anything I have bought in the past 20 years. My hills, ruts, and mud do create issues sometimes. If you don't have a lot of either the 422 is probably a good choice.

Barry, as much as you have used the 180, go for the 425. You are not a casual user and need that capability. I wonder if the 180 and the 422 have the same wheel motors. If so you may find that you have less relative torque. Check on this with PT.
That thought crossed my mind also. I believe they are the same wheel motors. The 180 is lighter and has narrower tires. So given the wider stance and somewhat heavier 422, it may take away from some of the torque I'm used to.

The 180 has been a great little machine and for half the cost of the 425. I know I come off as bragging some times at what the 180 is Capable of. I don't mean to sound that way. What it really boils down to is... I'm always surprised how well it does everything. I'm sure other 180 owners would agree. Thats what makes me think I would be more than happy with the larger 422.

The jury is still out on a 422 / 425. I also really like the 1430 but, would have to go used on that and hearing some of the horror stories lately. Buying something this size used, I would have to think twice.

My property does not have a lot of hills the only place I would like a little more torque from the wheel motors would be when I use the bucket for digging out our hard clay and shale. Anyway thanks for summing up your experiences. ;)
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #28  
Farmall140 said:
I have never "wanted" a 425 due to the lack of anything that the 422 does (or does not do) with the exception of the additional lift height. A makeshift ramp of some sort has always solved that problem! Sure, additional engine hp or wheel torque would be nice to have but lacking those features has yet to stop me from doing what I intended this tractor to do at purchase time.
Very nice to hear, you might be reading my thoughts...:)
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #29  
I ordered my PT-422 with ROPS in 2002. In 2002 the PT-422 and PT-425 were the same except for the ROPS and engine HP. My PT-422 does everything I need it to do. However, like everyone I sometimes wish it had a bit more power. I started thinking about upgrading to the Robin 25 hp when it comes time to replace the engine in a few years. I compared the Robin 22 hp to the Robin 25 hp engine. The Robin 22 hp is rated at continuous 17 hp. The Robin 25 hp engine is rated at a continuous 18 hp. Not much of an increase in contiuous HP rating for the cost.

While contemplating the cost difference of the extra continuous hp over the next couple of years I also decided to contemplate the idea of "being satisfied with what I have."

Dale
 
   / 422 vrs 425 #30  
DHS said:
I ordered my PT-422 with ROPS in 2002. In 2002 the PT-422 and PT-425 were the same except for the ROPS and engine HP. My PT-422 does everything I need it to do. However, like everyone I sometimes wish it had a bit more power. I started thinking about upgrading to the Robin 25 hp when it comes time to replace the engine in a few years. I compared the Robin 22 hp to the Robin 25 hp engine. The Robin 22 hp is rated at continuous 17 hp. The Robin 25 hp engine is rated at a continuous 18 hp. Not much of an increase in contiuous HP rating for the cost.

While contemplating the cost difference of the extra continuous hp over the next couple of years I also decided to contemplate the idea of "being satisfied with what I have."

Dale
I can relate,

I think the big sell for me on the 425 would be the dual steering cylinders and extra wheel torque, like most people have stated. I'm just not sure that it's worth an extra 2,500.

I think the 422 would be plenty of machine for me, as happy as I've been with the 180. I need to be real sure because once I decide, if after that I buy one more tractor. My wife is going to divorce me. :rolleyes: The next one has to last me for a life time.:cool:
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
2005 Dodge Caravan Van (A55853)
2005 Dodge Caravan...
2842 (A54756)
2842 (A54756)
2003 Walk-Behind Automatic Seed Spreader (A54811)
2003 Walk-Behind...
2014 Ford F-150 Ext. Cab 4x4 Pickup Truck (A53422)
2014 Ford F-150...
CHAMPION C80C MOTOR GRADER (A52707)
CHAMPION C80C...
 
Top