8 year old hurt

/ 8 year old hurt #2  
I was just going to post that link
After seeing it , It seems that the 'cop' investigating is going to go throught the 'old' statues to see if there was a law against her driving it. The trouble could be it was town property by the looks of it.
Hope this doesnt turn on yet another good willed volunteer .
Thank god she is ok.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #3  
Any idea of what brand ad model tractor she was operating?
 
/ 8 year old hurt #4  
hockeypuck said:
Tractor Runs Over Girl - Local News Story - WMUR Manchester

Fortunately she is going to be ok. I hope she was not operating that thing by herself.

Puck

It sounds like she was. It also sounds like it was a freak accident. I have caught levers dismounting. Even broke the handle off my loader valve. Something I really like about my tractor over the old ones is I can put in nuetral in three places at once and Ussually use at least two. Where I grew up that would not have been uncommon at 8. I don't think I started driving tractor till 12 though. My oldest is 10 now, and I will be teaching her around 12 or 13. I hope She recovers fully and doesn't grow up afraid of tractors because of this.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #5  
I saw Kubota LA272 on the loader in the video. So maybe a Kubota B7500?
 
/ 8 year old hurt #6  
There is a video in the link that shows a small kubota TLB. Loader model was la272. I'm guessing bx model.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #7  
I've also caught clothing on levers. This is why my son was never allowed to start the tractors or dismount a running tractor when learning. Knew an older & experienced farmer that reached back to shut off a dismounted tractor & bumped it into gear. He was disembowled by the rear wheel & lived 3 months in the hospital before dying. MikeD74T
 
/ 8 year old hurt #8  
Tractor looked to a b7500 or so. Definitely larger than a BX. She was helping her father clear the lot a the town fire station.... he is a fireman, and i believe he was volunteering some work as the town is putting an addition on the building. Regardless of what the state trooper said about researching state statutes.... looked to me that he was giving lip service to the reporter. I don't believe there will be any charges filed in the incident. When i fisrt saw the story on the news.... i thought, what fool would have his eight year old running the tractor?? Then i thought about the stuff i used to do with my father.... when i was not much older. Would i let my kids drive my tractor? Maybe. Important thing is the girl will be ok.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #9  
My JD4700 has three levers and they all have to be in gear to move the tractor. It is easy to snag a lever though. On my tractor if I get off the seat and put the tractor in gear the engine turns off. I have done this enough that I have gotten pretty good at falling back on to the seat to keep the engine going when I start to hear it stall. :D

I wonder if the tractor in question had a safety switch on the seat and if it was working.

Later,
Dan
 
/ 8 year old hurt
  • Thread Starter
#10  
dmccarty said:
My JD4700 has three levers and they all have to be in gear to move the tractor. It is easy to snag a lever though. On my tractor if I get off the seat and put the tractor in gear the engine turns off. I have done this enough that I have gotten pretty good at falling back on to the seat to keep the engine going when I start to hear it stall. :D

I wonder if the tractor in question had a safety switch on the seat and if it was working.

Later,
Dan


Good point. It should have shut off when she was not on the seat and the tractor went into gear. Now why didn't I think of that. Nice going sherlock mccarty.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #11  
hockeypuck said:
Good point. It should have shut off when she was not on the seat and the tractor went into gear. Now why didn't I think of that. Nice going sherlock mccarty.

How many tractors come with that??? I do buy the frequently used line "if it saves one life it's worth it...." It is used to justify more and more "safety" devices and more laws to "protect" us from our own foolishness.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #13  
mboulais said:
How many tractors come with that??? I do buy the frequently used line "if it saves one life it's worth it...." It is used to justify more and more "safety" devices and more laws to "protect" us from our own foolishness.


Actually my brain got ahead of my fingers and missed a whole word, that shoulda said I do not buy the frequently used line "if it saves one life it's worth it...."
 
/ 8 year old hurt #14  
I want the safety equipment. If you think safety equipment some how is a loss of your rights you are entitled to your opinion.

When my engine cuts off because the tractor is smart enough to know I am not in the seat and the tractor is in gear, that is a good thing. When this happens to me I'm getting ready to get of the tractor. Which means stepping in front of that big heavy tire. I am glad the tractor is cutting off the engine when my coat or hip puts the transmission into forward.

Later,
Dan
 
/ 8 year old hurt #16  
I don't think you are giving country folk enough credit. Those raised in rural areas aren't as quick to sue. I don't want the government to protect me from myself and cost of living would be a lot lower in this country if we weren't paying a premium for consumer goods like cars and tractors with excessive safety requirements on them.

I don't need a ROPS, but it was a convienent place to weld brackets to for additional lights.

I don't wear a seatbelt on the tractor. My first two tractors and both of the tractors I grew up on didn't have them or ROPS.

I don't need a driver presence switch on my tractor, I don't even have one on my mower. Children are injured around riding lawn mowers every year despite all the safety devices on them due to legislation and litigation. Those accidents occur due to that attitude that it must be safe because it has all these safety devices. People do dumb things because they do not respect the power they are dealing with.

I don't expect any sympathy from anyone, or any $$$$ from a lawsuit if I get hurt operating equipment.

I am niether reckless or stupid.I take responsibility for my own safety and manage quite well. Safety is more about thinking through a job and managing risks than relying on someone to legislate safety into your life.

The only legislation we need is to prevent product liability lawsuits. In the event that product liability is proven, fines can be levied thereby eliminating the lucrative nusiance lawsuit business.

"The government that governs least, governs best."

Sorry for the rant, but I only posted my opinion before and I felt the last post was a little personal. I obviously hit a nerve.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #18  
N80 said:
And when all is said and done, why all the whining? Don't like the ROPS, pull it off. Don't like the safety switchs? Remove them. If you're that bullet proof, more power to you. But, the problem is that when you share that sort of attitude/opinion on a web site that attracts new and potential tractor owners you run the risk of having such people assume that what makes sense for you, makes sense for them too. And it doesn't.

I've looked at ROPS and driver presence switchs long and hard from both sides and from a rational point of view. And I've spent two years using a tractor that has them. The more I think and the more I use the tractor the less credible and rational become the complaints against them.


It wasn't whining, It was explaining my view. New visitors to the site should get to see a variety of viewpoints and opinions. Again your assesment of others is pretty low if you think new tractor owners should not see an opposing view to the norm. I stress planning jobs and thinking ahead, not relying on the machine to protect you, that's all.

Every time you add a safety device to a machine you complicate the machine and complicate the operation of the machine.

My point with the lawn mowers is that no amount of safety devices on a lawn mower or tractor is going to compensate for stupidity.

Safety seems to too volatile a subject for us to discuss rationally. anyone who don't espouse the use of every possible safety feature on the market gets replies like the last two you just posted.:rolleyes:

OK... you win, you can have the safety forum. :eek:
 
/ 8 year old hurt #19  
mboulais said:
I stress planning jobs and thinking ahead, not relying on the machine to protect you, that's all.

And I'm not saying that is wrong. I'm just saying that you can't plan for everything. And if you work a tractor on property like mine, doing the wide variety of things like most of us do, planning is only going to account for a small percentage of what we actually end up doing at any given time.

Every time you add a safety device to a machine you complicate the machine and complicate the operation of the machine.

Yes, I'd agree with that. But at the same time you have to ask yourself just how much of a complication is a ROPs, or a seatbelt or a seat switch. I've got all that on my tractor. It complicates absolutely nothing for me.

My point with the lawn mowers is that no amount of safety devices on a lawn mower or tractor is going to compensate for stupidity.

Again, you are absolutely right, but that is not an argument against the safety equipment. You can't protect every idiot out there but there are countless seasoned tractor operators out there whose bacon has been saved by ROPs, seatbelts and seat switches.

Safety seems to too volatile a subject for us to discuss rationally. anyone who don't espouse the use of every possible safety feature on the market gets replies like the last two you just posted.:rolleyes:

I'm sorry you feel that way. Go back and look at my last few posts and look at yours. Who is being rational? Just because someone can't, won't or doesn't want to be rational doesn't mean that others can't. And I've been on these boards long enough that others can tell you, I'm not a member of the Safety Nazis. Just because I recognize the intrinsic value of 3 simple safety features doesn't make me an extremist.

OK... you win, you can have the safety forum. :eek:

That's fine. But it sounds like a cop out to me. If you have a valid point, make it. But don't just make it by saying "I do this" or "I never do that." So maybe we should start over. I'll throw these questions out and there not just aimed at you. For anyone who has or intends to disable these three saety features I'd love to hear your logic for doing so. Maybe there are aspects that I have not thought of that would change my miind and the minds of others who generally appreciate the safety features on our tractors.

You say you don't like your ROPS. Why not? What problems does it cause? Are those problems sufficient enough to remove it and put yourself at risk? what about other people who might use your tractor? Many of us have kids and older parents who are capable of using our tractors.

You say you still have your ROPS, but don't wear your seatbelt. Why not? How much trouble is a simple seatbelt? What realworld problems does it actually cause for you. Is that trouble sufficient enough to make not wearing a seat belt (on a tractor with a ROPS!) a reasonable risk?

I don't remember what you said about the operator presence switch. Have you or would you disable it? It is simple to do. If so, why? What actual, real world problems does it cause for you? How significant are those problems compared to the myriad ways in which you can leave the seat of a tractor in ways that you never planned, never intended and have no control over?

So, there's your chance. If you have an opinion on these matters, share it and defend it. If its just an opinion, and nothing else, well....you know what they say about opinions, we all got one just like....well...you know.
 
/ 8 year old hurt #20  
OK, I have an example of a safety feature that I believe is over-the-top and rediculous. My mom recently bought a Sabre (JD) lawn tractor with a hydro transmission that has a reverse "safety" button on the dash that you have to push before it will let you back up. If you try to back up before pushing the button, the engine dies.

I realize I am talking about a lawn tractor and not a CUT or bigger, but the principle is the same. I may be wrong about this general statement, but I can't believe there isn't one person on this board who wouldn't find some way to bypass this switch because the tractor was such a pain in the neck to use. I did it the second time I had to use the tractor.

This is not to say I'm against all safety items, ROPS, neutral-start lockouts, guards for moving parts, etc. make sense to me, but I do believe they can go too far sometimes.
 
 
Top