hazmat
Elite Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2002
- Messages
- 4,051
- Location
- West Newbury, MA & Harrison, ME
- Tractor
- Kubota L5460HSTC
<font color=blue>My mind would not wrap around the idea that a 3hp CAPO could put out 6.2cfm at 125psi when a 5hp Campbell could only put out 5.2 at 90 psi. Someone was either in-violation of newtonian physics or stretching the truth about the ability of their machine.</font color=blue>
Actually, both may be stretching the truth. The 5HP is a maximum developed horsepower under lab conditions, just before it stalls, feeding the motor as many amps as it will take before it blows up.
The 3HP also violates physics when plugged in at your shop.
115V * 20AMPS = 2300 Watts * .746 HP/1000 Watts = 1.7HP available on 115Volts. Ever notice how most table saws with a big honking motor are "only" 1.5HP. This is what they actually produce in the shop.
The difference is what kind of power they develop in your shop. the CAPO may very well make 1.7HP, while the cambell might only do 1HP. Looks like the CAPO has an induction motor vs. one of the universal motors. The induction motors tend to develop more usable HP. Also the CAPO compressor could be more efficient in transfering the power.
Actually, both may be stretching the truth. The 5HP is a maximum developed horsepower under lab conditions, just before it stalls, feeding the motor as many amps as it will take before it blows up.
The 3HP also violates physics when plugged in at your shop.
115V * 20AMPS = 2300 Watts * .746 HP/1000 Watts = 1.7HP available on 115Volts. Ever notice how most table saws with a big honking motor are "only" 1.5HP. This is what they actually produce in the shop.
The difference is what kind of power they develop in your shop. the CAPO may very well make 1.7HP, while the cambell might only do 1HP. Looks like the CAPO has an induction motor vs. one of the universal motors. The induction motors tend to develop more usable HP. Also the CAPO compressor could be more efficient in transfering the power.