BillyP
Veteran Member
DUMBDOG said:You cannot protect people against their own stupidity.
I wouldn't say stupidity. It's more like ignorance. That's where the big guys step up to bat. Sure you can afford this. ...
DUMBDOG said:You cannot protect people against their own stupidity.
Bob_Skurka said:Suppose you buy a new tractor. You expect the tractor to go up in value, but it does not. You get laid off, sick, or were barely hanging on financially when you took out the loan to buy the tractor. You fall behind on your payments and you end up owing more than the tractor is worth. Ultimately the tractor is repossessed.
Is the lending company that lent you the money to buy the tractor responsible for the fact that you didn't make your payments?![]()
BillyP, who are these "big guys" you want to step up to bat? Most of the mortgage brokers are sleazy used-car salesman politician types of people who have no problem sleeping at night. But they are not generally big companies. Go back and read the whole article that I linked to, you can see that the loan was sold from one small company to another to another, each time it was bundled with other loans to spread the risks over a bigger pool. But it started out with some small mortgage broker.BillyP in response to Dumbdog said:I wouldn't say stupidity. It's more like ignorance. That's where the big guys step up to bat. Sure you can afford this. ...
First I am not a lender, second, if I were to invest in the sub-prime market, I would only do it on a speculative basis and both spread & moderate the risk by combining it with some better quality loans. All loans carry some sort of risk for the lender, smart lenders mitigate their risks.BillyP said:Let me put it this way. In your earlier post #66 and you were the lender, would you?
Bob_Skurka said:BillyP, who are these "big guys" you want to step up to bat? Most of the mortgage brokers are sleazy used-car salesman politician types of people who have no problem sleeping at night. But they are not generally big companies. Go back and read the whole article that I linked to, you can see that the loan was sold from one small company to another to another, each time it was bundled with other loans to spread the risks over a bigger pool. But it started out with some small mortgage broker.
First I am not a lender, second, if I were to invest in the sub-prime market, I would only do it on a speculative basis and both spread & moderate the risk by combining it with some better quality loans. All loans carry some sort of risk for the lender, smart lenders mitigate their risks.
But it still goes back to the person borrowing the money, they could have shopped for a better deal. They did not do that.
They could have said no when the payments were higher than they could afford. They did not do that.
They could have negotiated the price down on the house to something more managable. They did not do that and admitted they overpaid.
The could have looked for a smaller house, perhaps a 3 bedroom instead of 4? They did not do that.
As the story goes, they ran out of money right from the very start, even before they could finish painting it. They walked into the deal so far in the hole that they just got deeper and deeper as they went along. It is a sad story for sure, but had made mistake after mistake and they are ultimately to blame. In the end, they have a good outlook on things and see that they need to take more responsibilty. I think that is a good sign.
Do gooder groups sued and said that it was racist, sexist and anything-else-you-call-it-ist to deny people loans. Heck did you know that it is now ILLEGAL to deny loans in some states to ILLEGAL ALIENS?cp1969 said:What ever happened to "Just say No" to loan applicants who don't meet those criteria?
BobRip said:I think some people try and save for a house and find it frustrating. You save $10,000 and the house goes up $40,000. The only chance you have is to buy something at great financial stress and hope you can make the payments, that or rent forever.