Peacock
Platinum Member
My 3.54 geared truck has gotten as high as 18.6, but that was loaded up with 4 people and a small trailer with 2 atvs.
There was a mention (here) of the smaller 4bt? Cummins, I wonder if that would be complicated to "tie" to a modern trans.? That would be pretty sweet in a small shortbed, 2wd fullsize 1/2 ton
There is no reason to de-tune a 5.9 Cummins, the brother in law runs a 3/4 ton 4wd 1996 Dodge with some Banks upgrades and gets over 20 mpg. (yea, I thought he was a liar too, until I took a long trip with him and did the fueling).
The 1996-1997's with the Bosch P7100 was the best Dodge Cummins engine for power and economy. The later engines became lame because of emission requirements.
Get a 1996 5.9 Cummins and put it in 2wd pickup with a NV4500 tranny and a Dana 44 2.72 (or 3.07) ratio differential. 25+ mpg should be easy to achieve.
You don't want the VE pump series engine, they are limited in RPM to about 2200, lots of torque but they're miserable out on the interstate. My old 1992 Dodge Cummins wouldn't go over 85 mpg.
Me? I am so sick of the lack of performance and economy of my 2001 24V Cummins I am pleased it needs a head gasket.
I was told to put a "non-emission" cam in it when I installed the engine, like a hardhead I didn't heed the advice.
The 24V Cummins cam is ground so that it actually lets some exhaust overlap into the intake to decrease emissions, that's astonishing government regulated idiocy. Better emissions, but burn 1/3rd more fuel, only government could come up with such goofiness.
Going to install a cam when I do the head gasket.
Is it possible the overlap is to increase scavaging effect