California
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 14,988
- Location
- An hour north of San Francisco
- Tractor
- Yanmar YM240 Yanmar YM186D
I can relate to nearly all of the posts above after experiencing 25 years of the next older generation in my family ageing, declining, passing. I was primary person responsible for some and involved with some others.
I can add one comment I haven't seen here: Reverse mortgages are pushed at the elderly. Don't do it.
I investigated this for Mom when at 95 she asked me to take over managing her finances. She had had live-in caregivers, with varying success, for several years at that point but was transitioning from 'sharing her home' with a pre-nursing student for example who got room, board, and a few hundred $ per week, to the greater expense of semi-skilled, and then skilled, caregiver.
At 95 it was clear Mom wouldn't live forever. I found there are standard rates for a Reverse Mortagage, in this case they would subtract $13,000 at signing (added to the amount due at the end) then they charged a high interest rate even though their risk of loss was minimal. As I recall they also paid out a fixed minimum per month so the debt grew quickly, whether you needed it that month or not. Overall it looked to me after I examined it (MBA here, financial analysis was one skill learned) like the reverse mortgage industry in this state was a get rich quick scheme for the lenders and a terrible financial ripoff for the elderly and their heirs.
After asking around looking for alternatives my Credit Union suggested go to Bank of America and take out a Home Improvement Loan secured by Mom's home. This was a couple of years before the 2008 financial crisis and banks were trying to lend money to anyone, I guess they had that bailout already lobbied and guaranteed to them so they couldn't lose. We wheeled in Mom in her wheelchair and she signed the papers shakily, everybody was pleased. We could draw whatever we wanted against that loan at any time and the borrowed amount simply incurred 7% interest, much cheaper than financing anything on a credit card etc. When Mom eventually passed 3 years later we paid back .$40k out of the proceeds of selling her house as agreed in the loan documents, there was never a hassle.
This had allowed Mom to stay in her home until the end as we had promised her we would try to accomplish. The house was her only significant asset. We didn't have a problem spending her equity to provide what she needed to remain there.
Now on the other side - most difficult case I've been close to is BIL who is a disabled veteran, with some brain damage that makes him hard to get along with. His younger brother said that recently seven successive caregivers sent out by an agency never showed up or never returned after their first day.
I can add one comment I haven't seen here: Reverse mortgages are pushed at the elderly. Don't do it.
I investigated this for Mom when at 95 she asked me to take over managing her finances. She had had live-in caregivers, with varying success, for several years at that point but was transitioning from 'sharing her home' with a pre-nursing student for example who got room, board, and a few hundred $ per week, to the greater expense of semi-skilled, and then skilled, caregiver.
At 95 it was clear Mom wouldn't live forever. I found there are standard rates for a Reverse Mortagage, in this case they would subtract $13,000 at signing (added to the amount due at the end) then they charged a high interest rate even though their risk of loss was minimal. As I recall they also paid out a fixed minimum per month so the debt grew quickly, whether you needed it that month or not. Overall it looked to me after I examined it (MBA here, financial analysis was one skill learned) like the reverse mortgage industry in this state was a get rich quick scheme for the lenders and a terrible financial ripoff for the elderly and their heirs.
After asking around looking for alternatives my Credit Union suggested go to Bank of America and take out a Home Improvement Loan secured by Mom's home. This was a couple of years before the 2008 financial crisis and banks were trying to lend money to anyone, I guess they had that bailout already lobbied and guaranteed to them so they couldn't lose. We wheeled in Mom in her wheelchair and she signed the papers shakily, everybody was pleased. We could draw whatever we wanted against that loan at any time and the borrowed amount simply incurred 7% interest, much cheaper than financing anything on a credit card etc. When Mom eventually passed 3 years later we paid back .$40k out of the proceeds of selling her house as agreed in the loan documents, there was never a hassle.
This had allowed Mom to stay in her home until the end as we had promised her we would try to accomplish. The house was her only significant asset. We didn't have a problem spending her equity to provide what she needed to remain there.
Now on the other side - most difficult case I've been close to is BIL who is a disabled veteran, with some brain damage that makes him hard to get along with. His younger brother said that recently seven successive caregivers sent out by an agency never showed up or never returned after their first day.