Right now RPM this is all speculation but I too doubt there is any real diffeence between the
BX2200 and the
BX22 frames. Whatever difference there might be I feel might be retrofittable--at some expense--or no expense if you are handy. I think the problem is that Kubota, continuing to be very clever in maintaining the BX's very small foot print/size/length has fitted the
BX22 with a backhoe that utilizes the BX seat in a turnaround position--in other words--the seat must swivel or remove and reinstall in a reverse position--this would also require the upper frame member cross brace to which the upper arm of the 3-point attaches to be different--so --- that is where the differences lie--not so much in the strength of the frame or it's basic design but in the rear area where swiviling the seat occurs. I could be wrong since like you guys all I have seen are a few pics.
Yep, the broke in half BX is a continuation of the broke in half Kubota B?(whatever) urban legend used by the green team whenever it is needed to make some ground on the orange team. It is unsubstantiated and if in fact someone installed a backhoe on a Kubota and it broke in hald because the subframe was not attached then they deserve it!
Nope, the BX is not a lawnmower and a critical look at the frame shows a stiff, robust, well braced design that may be at least equal to the B series--pound for pound. Frankly, this 2410 I got is a bigger tractor and it does have a heavier frame but proportionally the BX is at least it's equal. I think, properly set up with perhaps a homemade subframe, the BX should be able to handle a small backhoe. We shall see when the
BX22 comes available.
J