Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow.

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,341  
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,343  
Not everything sold in WalMart is made in China and not everything sold at small stores is made in USA.
Its up to the BUYER to read the label.
I guess the Chinese flying bombers over Taiwan is a peaceful act?
And trying to buy off American college professors, being caught in acts of espionage and patent infringement, sometimes on top secret information is just peaceful commerce? Have you ever seen the backlog of patent infringement cases against them?

OhhhhKayyyy

No doubt theyre modernizing at an amazing pace. I wont argue with that. I wish we could do that by attracting more business here and tax them at a reasonable level.
You do know that Taiwan is PART of China, right? And the US doing this is? All this China bashing does NOTHING to improve our own lives here in the US: it's an excuse; works really well to bilk US taxpayers out of money for "defense".
 
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,344  
You do know that Taiwan is PART of China, right? And the US doing this is? All this China bashing does NOTHING to improve our own lives here in the US: it's an excuse; works really well to bilk US taxpayers out of money for "defense".
Ummm no its a sovereign nation

“Taiwan is Taiwan, and China is China. They are different countries, and Taiwan is not a part of China. There has not been a single day in the 55 years since the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 that China has had effective control of Taiwan.

Taiwan can be considered a nation in today's world -- it fulfills all requirements for nationhood according to international law. Taiwan has a population of 23 million people and has sovereignty over, and effective control of, the defined territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. These areas are controlled by a government which has the right to form policies and the ability to conduct diplomatic, economic and other types of exchanges with other countries throughout the world.

From the perspective of international law, Taiwan ceased to be a part of China in 1895. Over the years Taiwan has evolved into a country in its own right. During the course of this development there have been a number of important milestones.”

Source: UNPO: Taiwan is a modern, sovereign nation


And BTW: I’m not bashing China. I’m saying we better get off their teat real fast, or we really, I mean REALLY wont survive if they want to screw with us. I dont like that. Do you? I like the ability to a least survive on my own. I may not thrive, but I’d like to survive. Its a matter of national security that we can build our own EVs or ICEVs

I dont want an America with streets cluttered with Chinese EVs, all to soothe the feelings of the “world is ending in 9 years” emotional types.
 
Last edited:
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,345  
Look Gale, trying to put words in my mouth isnt the way to go. I just showed you CA is cutting off the sale of ICEV in about a decade. That alone will cut the sales of ICEV down 10-15% just based on population statistics (CA is 10-15% of US population). That pretty much signals the end, as states that want to be like CA will likely follow.
When you say theres no reason to mandate, be sure to remember, it already IS mandated with CA forcing the end of the sale of ICEVs.
I’m all for markets determining whats better.
But you know putting an end to a competitors production isnt a mandate to buy EVs, its a mandate to destroy the competition. Which at the end of the day, is the same thing.

You are correct that China has been spoon feeding us everything we need for quite some time. With the probable end of American GM and Ford jobs building cars and all the support systems that exist around the ICEV, we are possibly putting the final nails in the coffin of the American experiment. We will lose our independence. There will be little industrial production left, but a few token industries. Chinese built or cars with majority Chinese parts will become the norm here.

If you view that as a “win” or “progress”, then you and I view the world quite differently.
I’d rather see a market based competition with NO mandates to see what the people chose, not one small group of people who may or may not have this countries best interests in mind.
Let's be honest here, OK?

US is spoon-feeding the entire world with worthless, backed by nothing but the "good faith" of the US govt (controlled by the bankers and corporations), USD. In return its "US population" gets actual products and resources (finite stuff that seems too precious to give away for worthless paper).

Wait until the natural consequences of the USD fiat currency come to a close. THIS will have nothing to do with China: other than they, Russia, Iran and it's looking more an more like it every day, India, push away from SWIFT and into their own trading system- this diminishes the need for USD, and will push it toward a tipping point.

Complaining that our govt is pushing EVs on us while accepting the our govt is pushing USDs on China seems to be a bit uneven. <- While perhaps no specifically stated, it is, nonetheless, the facts on the ground.
 
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,346  
This thread is about electric vehicles. Political opinions are worse than normal opinions because they come from the body part we relate to opinions.

The Silverado EV was introduced, it seems the Avalanche is back.
 
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,347  
Ummm no its a sovereign nation

“Taiwan is Taiwan, and China is China. They are different countries, and Taiwan is not a part of China. There has not been a single day in the 55 years since the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 that China has had effective control of Taiwan.

Taiwan can be considered a nation in today's world -- it fulfills all requirements for nationhood according to international law. Taiwan has a population of 23 million people and has sovereignty over, and effective control of, the defined territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. These areas are controlled by a government which has the right to form policies and the ability to conduct diplomatic, economic and other types of exchanges with other countries throughout the world.

From the perspective of international law, Taiwan ceased to be a part of China in 1895. Over the years Taiwan has evolved into a country in its own right. During the course of this development there have been a number of important milestones.”

Source: UNPO: Taiwan is a modern, sovereign nation


And BTW: I’m not bashing China. I’m saying we better get off their teat real fast, or we really, I mean REALLY wont survive if they want to screw with us. I dont like that. Do you? I like the ability to a least survive on my own. I may not thrive, but I’d like to survive.

I dont want an America with streets cluttered with Chinese EVs, all to sooth the feelings of the “world is ending in 9 years” emotional types.
UNPO is????

Japan messed things up: part of their terror campaign against China. China was backward and had little ability to flex in the international community up until recently. Think about whether China could make a claim that Puerto Rico isn't part of the US: want to talk about a really messed up situation?

Here's the standing OFFICIAL US policy

Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume XVII, China, 1969–1972 - Office of the Historian

Simple overview:
International Law Is Taiwan’s Enemy

I don't give a rat's behind about other countries. I just spot festering propaganda that's meant to eat away at our brains so that we don't see the thieves among us (the power elite). If Communism is so bad then let it crash and burn on its own (like Cuba- do we really have to spend decades and countless dollars trying to overthrow its government?).

Last I'll say on this. But know this, much is PROJECTION, and it's totally working in opposition to what the proponent/projectioner thinks: for every action... (<- why it's stupid to be applying any energy to ousting Cuba's government; it only provides rallying support; one could almost think that the real objective is to keep people outraged such that they don't notice that their pockets are being picked for "defense" reasons).

As others have stated, markets will have to shift. Either folks in the US collectively, yes, COLLECTIVELY (sounds a bit socialist, no? sorry, but that's the basis for any group) decide to alter policies to promote local production. I don't think that we have to paint others ugly in order to do the right thing. Again, when the wheels fall off the USD it'll be pay-back (and I won't blame others).
 
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,348  
“UNPO is???”
Open the link?
 
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,349  
I’d say it’s smarter than sending our dollars to a bunch of jihadist supporters in Saudi Arabia.
…then again, China doesn’t buy as much military equipment from the US as they do.
Didn’t know China bought any military equipment from us….
Energy independence would be a walk in the park for the US to achieve. If its used to power EV or ICEV, it could all be in the palm of our hands
 
   / Battery based electric vehicles of today and tomorrow. #7,350  
Haydude made a good point I never considered before...

The EV revolution (gales words not mine) does just transfer our wealth to china.

Is this a smart move?
Trading worthless USDs for goods?

The entire world knows that the USD is going to collapse. I'd speculate that a lot of the Green push has to do with limiting/controlling that impact: consider that the majority of the worlds trade value is in energy, fossil fuels, and that the USD is the currency used to engage in that trade (US gets to skim transactions- it's a great gig). No more do people believe that oil is infinite and as such the perceived value against the USD is only going to go up. Discrediting oil is a way of diminishing that trend. These are the facts. What we do with them is the issue: I will NOT pretend that I have "answers" (anyone who does is a false prophet).

The US opted to spend trillions on wars and "defense" spending while others spent on increasing trade capabilities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Top