radioman
Super Member
I have lost a lot of fluid over the years due to flats, so I went with the weights, there was only a $5 difference. I also reasoned I could take the weights off if needed, of course in the two plus years I have owned it they have never been off.
good point here. liquid ballast is not for everyone, esp in flat inducing areas.
I only had one flat in my rears and that is when I noticed my rimguard was leaking through the tire stem. It was the oddest way of a leak. it was between the rubber of stem cover and the metal screw on part. It was like it was defective tire stem. luckly I had my BH on and just lifted rears off ground and replaced the stem. For cost of stem replacement, I felt there was no need to bother with kubota warranty. this just shows that with liquid ballast, you can be easily prone to "lose money" . However for amount of fluid lost and I kept valvee hole upwards, amount lost was negliable.
It's good to know that there are options for rear weights and my preferance is filled rears. If I keep getting rear flats, I would have switched to tire cast weights or ballast box, although I would hate the additional length in back of my tractor.