sandman2234
Super Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 6,008
- Location
- Jacksonville, Florida
- Tractor
- JD2555 and a few Allis Chalmers and now one Kubota
I can appreciate the questions that this boom mower brings up. I have a boom mower on a Ford 7710 with duals that will reach anywhere around the rear(180 degree circle)within 25'. If I stretch it out, I can pick up the front end and it has more than 1200 pounds of weight up there.
Has anyone considered adapting dual wheels to the PT to make them more stable when boom mower is in use, or are the axles too light for that? A Steiner boom mower uses weights to offset the boom, but duals tend to help. My tractor has a Lexan shield to prevent flying debris, but only on one side, as most cutting is done there. Chains to help with the flying debris would add unwanted weight to the mowing deck, but maybe rubber tire strips could be added without too much additional weight.
It appears that PT mounted the offset weight bar to the front lift. This raises the weight when the boom mower is raised. Is there an advantage to this? Seems like added weight up high just makes it more subject to bad handling characteristics.
Why are the wheels so hard to reverse on the PT? I don't remember what they look like, but seems removing and replacing lugnuts shouldn't take long. Probably more to it than that.
I would consider making a change to the straight arm, by either making it telescope or add a knuckle as in their more expensive mower. It will allow for a much more versatile mower, as you can't always control just how far you need to be away from what your mowing. My boom mower is knuckled like a backhoe, plus has the extendable feature like an "extendahoe". Works great, adding a lot of versatility to the mower.
Since the PT has a lot of hydraulic capacity, why not add an idler wheel with a hydraulic cylinder pushing down on an extra tire, on the side where the arm is overhanging? Seems a little downward pressure would help, especially if the idler arm extended a foot or so past the existing drive tire. It wouldn't take much design work, and could be made to remove when not needed. Maybe mounted somewhere on the frame near the front tire.
David from jax
David from jax
Has anyone considered adapting dual wheels to the PT to make them more stable when boom mower is in use, or are the axles too light for that? A Steiner boom mower uses weights to offset the boom, but duals tend to help. My tractor has a Lexan shield to prevent flying debris, but only on one side, as most cutting is done there. Chains to help with the flying debris would add unwanted weight to the mowing deck, but maybe rubber tire strips could be added without too much additional weight.
It appears that PT mounted the offset weight bar to the front lift. This raises the weight when the boom mower is raised. Is there an advantage to this? Seems like added weight up high just makes it more subject to bad handling characteristics.
Why are the wheels so hard to reverse on the PT? I don't remember what they look like, but seems removing and replacing lugnuts shouldn't take long. Probably more to it than that.
I would consider making a change to the straight arm, by either making it telescope or add a knuckle as in their more expensive mower. It will allow for a much more versatile mower, as you can't always control just how far you need to be away from what your mowing. My boom mower is knuckled like a backhoe, plus has the extendable feature like an "extendahoe". Works great, adding a lot of versatility to the mower.
Since the PT has a lot of hydraulic capacity, why not add an idler wheel with a hydraulic cylinder pushing down on an extra tire, on the side where the arm is overhanging? Seems a little downward pressure would help, especially if the idler arm extended a foot or so past the existing drive tire. It wouldn't take much design work, and could be made to remove when not needed. Maybe mounted somewhere on the frame near the front tire.
David from jax
David from jax