bigbull338
Elite Member
while your doing that id put a new muffler on it.
Any thoughts on the Deere 2040? Price looks decent in comparison to other machines listed online, but I rarely offer what people are asking. In the limited research I could do, seems that a '76 less desirable than the later years that had: more power ('80+), closed center hydraulic system ('77+), top shaft synchronized trans ('80+), independent PTO ('80+), 4x4 ('80+)
Can anyone help bring me up to speed quickly with what to look for in regards to any potential issues? Any thoughts on the closed vs open hydraulics?
Just got off the phone with the seller. It was originally owned by a property maintenance company. He is the 2nd owner and has had it for about 20 yrs. He had a landscaping business and said he used it to load mulch and salt during the winter. He said it hasn't had much use outside of clearing the driveway in the winter in the last 10 yrs due to some health conditions. There's a fuel line that needs to be replaced. He also made mention that it starts up no problem with a shot of ether. I inquired more about this and he said he would do that because it would sit so long between uses. I don't really like the sound of that personally.
He explained that he thought his price was well below what its worth and if he 'restored' it (clean, paint, fix fuel line) he could get $12k for it...but he needs money now. He did let me know he turned down an offer of $3500.
Thoughts?
I've got a 2440 and a 2640 that I keep around to this day because of their hydraulics being FAR BETTER (ie faster cycling, better flow) than competitive Massey Ferguson, Ford, and IH tractors of the same era. Both are running hydraulic powered ditch bank mowers that require high flow and constant fast cycling.
Funny.....The 30, 40, and 50 series Deere's are what just about ran every one else out of business in the 70's and 80's, and in every case I know of, the farmers who owned and operated them listed their far superior hydraulics (compared to the rest of the market) as one of the primary reasons why they made the switch to Deere (and stayed there)
You Deere haters are a comical lot sometimes!
considering all the parts in a tractor and component prices vs unit price of the machine.. it's a wonde rmore manufacturers didn't just incorporate higher gpm pumps on their stock machines.
lets face it.. early machines with 3-4 gpm pumps? that's comical. then mid classics with 5-7 gpm? still not great.. gives you a slow laoder... fine for tail wheel stuff.
10 and 12 gpm? ok for small to medium laoders.. etc.. can't imagine the price to upgrade on the unit at time of build was really that much, vs the difference it made to the customer..
soundguy
One thing for example is the the control valve for loader has an issue. The lever that works the arms will drop them if pulled back about half way. If pulled further it raises the arms as its supposed to (although a bit slower than I think it should). What would cause that?