patrick_g said:
Gemini went to the trouble to look for, find (wherever/however), and post the applicable information written in a manner accessible to the majority of readers and instead of being thanked he gets sniped at.
Oh well... Civility may not be dead but apparently is beginning to cough up blood.
I for one appreciate the information being presented and think it was RIGHT ON. Surely no one was expected to think Gemini wrote this extemporaneously.
Pat
Go read Wikipedias article on GIVING CREDIT when copying info.
Here is a link-
Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From the above link- (note I cited the source)-
BEGIN CITE
Why sources should be cited
Main articles: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research
Wikipedia is by its very nature a work by people with widely different knowledge and skills. The reader needs to be assured that the material within it is reliable: this is especially important where statements are made about controversial issues. The purpose of citing your sources is:
To improve the overall credibility and authoritative nature of Wikipedia.
To credit a source for providing useful material and to avoid claims of plagiarism.
To show that your edit is not original research.
To ensure that the content of articles is credible and can be checked by any reader or editor.
To help users find additional information on the topic.
To reduce the likelihood of editorial disputes, or to resolve any that arise.
To ensure that material about living persons complies with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
END CITE
Red emphasis added by me
I wasn't commenting on its content being questionable- the comment was about reposting stuff from other sites without giving credit.