...I would note that the event in Wisconsin has only one thing in common with this thread, and that is they both involved bridges.
Your wrong they these two events have TWO things in common, they were both bridges, and the powers that be did not do what should be done to protect the public.
Here we have a bridge builder that refuses to do it right, and Wisconsin also had info and reports but failed to act - both KNEW what should be done, and both refused to do so.
In wisconsin - A key factor with this bridge is that it was an older
non-redundant design, ( NOTE THEY KNEW THIS ) which the engineers call "fracture critical". The term "structurally deficient" is an engineering term that can be applied for a variety of reasons. ( THEY ALSO KNEW THIS AND DID NOTHING ) , though none of them would build a bridge like that today knowing what we know since 1967.
( Oh, and they didn't shut the bridge down )
So how did that conversation go "Hey dude, man is that bridge bogus, I would NEVER build one like that thing"
ALSO.....Inspections as far back as 2000 on the Wisconsin bridge identified both corrosion in the steel and a lot of cracking, says Stehly.
HEY here's an idea...lets let people keep driving on it.
Tell that one to the families that died. Uh, we knew the bridge was falling apart, but we still let people drive on it.
And now we have someone that refuses to engineer a bridge, yet wants to select a pretty color.
I've got a color, how about blood red!