t1kilo
Silver Member
I was on YouTube this morning and ran across this video from a few months ago. I found it very interesting and thought some of you who might be considering a new tractor might like to see it.
Let's take a look at the "other" tractors he listed.I was on YouTube this morning and ran across this video from a few months ago. I found it very interesting and thought some of you who might be considering a new tractor might like to see it.
Strange, just a few short years ago Neil and several members here were telling us repeatedly how Kubota and John Deere had 80% of the compact tractor market and these other company's were fighting for what's left.
Now he is saying its 65-75% just a few short years later.
Sounds to me like these other tractors company's are chipping away pretty good at their compact market share IMO. .
Strange, just a few short years ago Neil and several members here were telling us repeatedly how Kubota and John Deere had 80% of the compact tractor market and these other company's were fighting for what's left.
Now he is saying its 65-75% just a few short years later.
Sounds to me like these other tractors company's are chipping away pretty good at their compact market share IMO. .
I personally wouldn't touch any of these models, new or used; at least not yet. I see them being a flash in the pan for support, but I hope I'm wrong. They are probably good tractors for the $ but I would worry about long term dealer and parts support. By flash in the pan I mean they won't be around in 5 or 10 years.Even then, it'll be interesting to see how brands attached to a distribution model (Rural King, Summit) do compared to more traditional dealers (Bad Boy, McCormick [compacts]).
Thinking of some of the history of Kubota.Dad had an IH dealership in the 70s-early 80s. Oof. I lived through how bad it can get.
Since he posted the video, we have started to see this. The Korean brands have continued to chip away at Kubota and JD. As mentioned earlier, this is how Kubota got viable in the 70s...bargain brand during hard economic times.
The implication that the smaller brands only could fight over the scraps left by the big boys has been proven wrong time and time again. It is the big boys who are most vulnerable in terms of share.