VAChesterfield
Bronze Member
Great discussion and dialog. I'd like to add a bit more to the insights others have been providing based upon my years of experience and training as a supply chain professional.
Think for a moment what advantages an "overseas" company has in establishing a "local" assembly plant, such as Toyota putting an assembly plant in Mississippi or the example MessickFarmEqu provided.
From a pure supply chain perspective, one of the most wasteful shipping costs is shipping air. You ship a fully assembled car, truck, tractor, and you are shipping lots of air ... air that no one is paying you to ship.
So the obvious first step is to break down your product into a low configuration and let the guy on the other end "assemble" it. Think in terms of those Chinese tractors in a can that get "assembled" over here. Now the manufacturer has saved a bunch of money in shipping costs, and usually starts thinking about what other costs it can squeeze out so it can better compete ... on the basis of cost alone. The typical next step is to build the 2nd tier components in the "home" country, and let the "locals" do all of the final assembly. Most of the cost (labor & materials) goes into the components anyway, and shipping components versus knocked down but almost fully assembled end products means you can cram lots more product into a container and ship even less air.
Companies also realize that by waiting until a customer (which could be a dealer) orders a specific tractor or automobile in a specific configuration (optional equipment) before final assembly, one can reduce inventory costs, especially the need to unload at a discount the turkeys you built that no one is buying. Toyota is a master at this game, known as "channel delay", and will even ship assembled autos from Japan to USA (lots of air) that only lack optional equipment ... equipment that gets added on here in the US once someone places an order -- and still make money.
As international companies get more sophisticated in playing this game (again, Toyota is the shining example), they establish engineering and design groups in the USA to ensure the people designing the products they sell here really do understand, and are a part of, our culture.
All the while this is going on the company gets to make increasing claims about building their product in America with American workers.
Furthermore, as MessickFarmEqu points out, some "overseas' companies truly have shifted or are in the process of shifting the lion's share of work to the US. The new Hyundai plant in Alabama is a good example. While Hyundai brings lots of parts in from overseas, they are steadily building up a network of 2nd and 3rd tier suppliers in local area. Carefully balancing what is made here and what is made there, they achieve cost efficiencies that allow them to outsell everyone. Plus, they can bring a new product or design that customers want to market faster than the competition thereby gaining market share.
Finally, I second MessickFarmEqu's suggestion to read "The World is Flat".
Think for a moment what advantages an "overseas" company has in establishing a "local" assembly plant, such as Toyota putting an assembly plant in Mississippi or the example MessickFarmEqu provided.
From a pure supply chain perspective, one of the most wasteful shipping costs is shipping air. You ship a fully assembled car, truck, tractor, and you are shipping lots of air ... air that no one is paying you to ship.
So the obvious first step is to break down your product into a low configuration and let the guy on the other end "assemble" it. Think in terms of those Chinese tractors in a can that get "assembled" over here. Now the manufacturer has saved a bunch of money in shipping costs, and usually starts thinking about what other costs it can squeeze out so it can better compete ... on the basis of cost alone. The typical next step is to build the 2nd tier components in the "home" country, and let the "locals" do all of the final assembly. Most of the cost (labor & materials) goes into the components anyway, and shipping components versus knocked down but almost fully assembled end products means you can cram lots more product into a container and ship even less air.
Companies also realize that by waiting until a customer (which could be a dealer) orders a specific tractor or automobile in a specific configuration (optional equipment) before final assembly, one can reduce inventory costs, especially the need to unload at a discount the turkeys you built that no one is buying. Toyota is a master at this game, known as "channel delay", and will even ship assembled autos from Japan to USA (lots of air) that only lack optional equipment ... equipment that gets added on here in the US once someone places an order -- and still make money.
As international companies get more sophisticated in playing this game (again, Toyota is the shining example), they establish engineering and design groups in the USA to ensure the people designing the products they sell here really do understand, and are a part of, our culture.
All the while this is going on the company gets to make increasing claims about building their product in America with American workers.
Furthermore, as MessickFarmEqu points out, some "overseas' companies truly have shifted or are in the process of shifting the lion's share of work to the US. The new Hyundai plant in Alabama is a good example. While Hyundai brings lots of parts in from overseas, they are steadily building up a network of 2nd and 3rd tier suppliers in local area. Carefully balancing what is made here and what is made there, they achieve cost efficiencies that allow them to outsell everyone. Plus, they can bring a new product or design that customers want to market faster than the competition thereby gaining market share.
Finally, I second MessickFarmEqu's suggestion to read "The World is Flat".