Calculating lbs/sq ft.

[Wheatland KB]

How big is the floor and how will it be supported? Once you have the joists sized (think span tables) will it be worth decking it with 1" x 6" t&g and covering that with 1/2" ply or osb.

Check your building code for calculations and include the tractor weight as point loads (under tires) and dead load (floor area).

I have a wooden floor that is 2x8 joists 12" oc with a span of 10' decked with 2x6 and I drive/park my L3400 with FEL and tiller attached (I can't recall the weight but it must be around 3000) with no issues whatsoever.

KB

 

[Charlton John]

Good info - critical question, though - what's the unsupported span of the 2X6's?

Good question I should have been more specific. The floor is also constructed w/ 5 4x4 skids for extra support as well so the max unsupported span in my pole barn is probably around 30" all lumber is also pressure treated.

 

[Wheatland KB]

Good question I should have been more specific. The floor is also constructed w/ 5 4x4 skids for extra support as well so the max unsupported span in my pole barn is probably around 30" all lumber is also pressure treated.

Wow. Unless I read this wrong, it sounds like you're parking on a lumber pile!
2x6 at 6" oc with 30" span decked with 1" screwed and glued. You could park a cement truck in there.

 

[Charlton John]

Wow. Unless I read this wrong, it sounds like you're parking on a lumber pile!
2x6 at 6" oc with 30" span decked with 1" screwed and glued. You could park a cement truck in there.

You are reading this correctly. I really wanted concrete originally but at the time we built this (last fall 07) concrete prices were outragous (even getting a discount from a buddy) and here in my area the concrete unions were also on strike at the time so I didnt want to wait. I spent a little extra for the floor material but IMHO well well worth it for my peace of mind. Still turned out way less than the price for concrete and as mentioned in my other post I could easily drive a truck on it w/ no problem, See Pic.

 

[orezok]

If you have 30 PSI in a tire, it will exert 30 psi on the floor.

This is a common misconception about tires and how they work.

A tire works by the air pressure inside stiffening the sidewalls, which are the primary load-bearing mechanism.

If you increase the pressure in a 30 psi tire to 60 psi, the area in contact with the ground will not be cut in half.

My response was not intended to take into consideration the dynamics of a semi-solid structure such as a tire. It was purely a law of physics response.

If you add the tire dynamics, it will result in greater pressure at the edge of the tire due to sidewall stiffness, no pressure between the ribs not in contact with a flat surface and a whole range of spot pressures in between. Over the area of the contact patch with a flat surface, it will average 30 psi if the tire has 30 psi of pressure.

The bottom line is that every action has a opposite and equal reaction. It's a law of physics that not even NASA can deny.

 

[MikeD74T]

My response was not intended to take into consideration the dynamics of a semi-solid structure such as a tire. It was purely a law of physics response.
If you add the tire dynamics, it will result in greater pressure at the edge of the tire due to sidewall stiffness, no pressure between the ribs not in contact with a flat surface and a whole range of spot pressures in between. Over the area of the contact patch with a flat surface, it will average 30 psi if the tire has 30 psi of pressure.
The bottom line is that every action has a opposite and equal reaction. It's a law of physics that not even NASA can deny.

Even if your response made sense, and I'm not sure it does, the question is - How much does the floor have to push back up while remaining intact? Your hypothesis that the ground pressure equals tire pressure only works up to the point that the ground fails. Try it out on thin ice sometime!
BTW 30 psi = 4320 lb/ft2, lots of wood floors rated far less than that successfully hold up tractors every day. MikeD74T

 

[MikeD74T]

Raykos, If you're looking for an engineered answer you'll not likely get one for free - liability issues you know. If you want to figure it out for yourself support a 16" square of plywood on 2 sides with 2"x2''s, drive up onto it, & measure the deflection. Now try it again with the 2x's directly under the tire - no deflection !!! Place the stringers directly under the tires or at least narrow the spacing. That's 1/2 the equation.
Since you didn't indicate any building dimensions you next you need to determine the deflection of the supporting structure. If you are always going to park in the same place you need to think of your floor like a bridge -with extra stringers under the path of travel. Easier if they are also parallel. More details please! MikeD74T

 

[MikeD74T]

Do not use milled limber!! The strength is too variable. Look at engineered floor joists where you can get span/load tables. Also with 1" or better tongue and groove plywood screwed and glued to the joists, with glued joints. Vernon

OH Ye of little faith!! I know of not a single covered bridge in New England built of engineered lumber. Many built before Texas declared statehood & still see traffic daily. MikeD74T

 

[pat32rf]

When I build my decks I normally use 2x6PT on 2x8 floor joists (16"center) which have a 6-7 span between main beams(doubled 2x8s). I have regularly driven 30hp Masseys and my 4300JD on them. The main beams are on 8-10"sono tubes, (depending on soil conditions) and have a 8-10' span, anywhere from 12" to 4' above ground

 

[pycoed]

Even if your response made sense, and I'm not sure it does, the question is MikeD74T

Blimey Mike - it's Newton's third law( Gospel since 1687) & you think it doesn't make sense!!!!!!!


Probably the greatest scientist ever :


"Isaac Newton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sir Isaac Newton, FRS (4 January 1643 31 March 1727 [OS: 25 December 1642 20 March 1727])[1] was an English physicist, mathematician, astronomer, natural philosopher, alchemist, and theologian and one of the most influential men in human history. His Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687, is considered to be the most influential book in the history of science,"