N80
Super Member
I've got a 10 year old F150 that burns about a quart every 1000 or so. No leaks on the ground. No oil underneath or in engine bay. No blue smoke. Runs great, has always been reliable.
The other day my wife asked if it needed an oil change. I told her that now it never needed an oil change since it was getting a fresh quart every 1000 miles.
I think she believed me.
Here is a true stealership story. Harrelson Nissan in Rock Hill, SC. Had brakes done on my 1990 Pathfinder. This was in about 1998. I go to pick it up and they tell me there is a problem and to come back to the garage to see. One of the lug studs is broken. They quote me some ridiculous price to replace it. Then the mechanic (young punk) tells me they are ALL bad. Watch, he says, and starts cranking away at a lug nut with his impact wrench. Pop! the stud breaks. Watch, he says, and starts to do another one. I told him not to touch my truck again with that impact wrench. Drove it home with two broken lug studs, had them replaced elsewhere and drove the truck for years more with no lug stud problems. Essentially he was tearing up my car while I watched and expecting me to pay.
I'm not too sure there is anything they won't do if they think they can get away with it.
The funny thing is, I know lots of people in many lines of work and very few of those people are the type who will take monetary advantage of someone just because they can. So how is it that so many dealerships are able to employ so many unscrupulous and dishonest people, from the management all the way to the mechanics?
And my last conspiracy theory rant is this: I think a lot of CEL codes, or at least the sensitivity level for throwing codes, is a calculated money maker for the dealerships and designed specifically that way by the manufacturer as part of their revenue. And while that may sound crazy, it has been fairly well documented that many parts ARE designed with an obsolescence date that is far earlier than most of the other parts on the car and that the replacement and repair of these parts is calculated into the revenue stream by the manufacturer. So suspecting that some codes serve the same purpose is not that much of a stretch.
The other day my wife asked if it needed an oil change. I told her that now it never needed an oil change since it was getting a fresh quart every 1000 miles.
I think she believed me.
Here is a true stealership story. Harrelson Nissan in Rock Hill, SC. Had brakes done on my 1990 Pathfinder. This was in about 1998. I go to pick it up and they tell me there is a problem and to come back to the garage to see. One of the lug studs is broken. They quote me some ridiculous price to replace it. Then the mechanic (young punk) tells me they are ALL bad. Watch, he says, and starts cranking away at a lug nut with his impact wrench. Pop! the stud breaks. Watch, he says, and starts to do another one. I told him not to touch my truck again with that impact wrench. Drove it home with two broken lug studs, had them replaced elsewhere and drove the truck for years more with no lug stud problems. Essentially he was tearing up my car while I watched and expecting me to pay.
I'm not too sure there is anything they won't do if they think they can get away with it.
The funny thing is, I know lots of people in many lines of work and very few of those people are the type who will take monetary advantage of someone just because they can. So how is it that so many dealerships are able to employ so many unscrupulous and dishonest people, from the management all the way to the mechanics?
And my last conspiracy theory rant is this: I think a lot of CEL codes, or at least the sensitivity level for throwing codes, is a calculated money maker for the dealerships and designed specifically that way by the manufacturer as part of their revenue. And while that may sound crazy, it has been fairly well documented that many parts ARE designed with an obsolescence date that is far earlier than most of the other parts on the car and that the replacement and repair of these parts is calculated into the revenue stream by the manufacturer. So suspecting that some codes serve the same purpose is not that much of a stretch.