To20Chris
Platinum Member
Hopefully more people will find out about TBN and be able to get the tractor they need the first time out! I always cringe when I read a post where someone bought the wrong size tractor and wants to trade after a year or so - I know they are going to get hammered, regardless of brand.
Resale is an important issue, and not all of the brands out there now are going to make it. If you get stuck with one that doesn't your resale value is going to be real bad for a long time. How important resale is will vary for each person, and how each brand does in the long term will be different.
It's all a matter of how you look at risk. I tend to look at how the company is set up when geussing about their long term viability. Frankly, there are a couple that I just don't get! The almost complete separation between manufacturers and the marketers (brand) with some Chinese tractors scares me a lot. It's one thing to have a joint agreement (i.e. NH/Shibura), it's another to just buy shipments and that's the last the mfg has to do with it. It seems like some of them are starting to change that. Mahindra markets tractors from others with both well known (Mitsubishi) and unknown manufacturers with their own name, which no one has ever heard of. They seem to be good tractors, but I'm wondering how that stratagy is going to work. Conversely, if enough people recognize that a previously big-time brand name is nothing more than that, it's value will become worthless. There is one in particular that seems to be going that way - will they survive?
Anyway, it pays to look a little deeper than just the tractor itself, or the name, when evaluating how big a risk you're taking.
Resale is an important issue, and not all of the brands out there now are going to make it. If you get stuck with one that doesn't your resale value is going to be real bad for a long time. How important resale is will vary for each person, and how each brand does in the long term will be different.
It's all a matter of how you look at risk. I tend to look at how the company is set up when geussing about their long term viability. Frankly, there are a couple that I just don't get! The almost complete separation between manufacturers and the marketers (brand) with some Chinese tractors scares me a lot. It's one thing to have a joint agreement (i.e. NH/Shibura), it's another to just buy shipments and that's the last the mfg has to do with it. It seems like some of them are starting to change that. Mahindra markets tractors from others with both well known (Mitsubishi) and unknown manufacturers with their own name, which no one has ever heard of. They seem to be good tractors, but I'm wondering how that stratagy is going to work. Conversely, if enough people recognize that a previously big-time brand name is nothing more than that, it's value will become worthless. There is one in particular that seems to be going that way - will they survive?
Anyway, it pays to look a little deeper than just the tractor itself, or the name, when evaluating how big a risk you're taking.