I sat on a jury nearly 30 years ago, and determined a young man's fate for life. Armed robbery. One person already convicted for the crime was sentenced to 20 years, so this was a serious matter. The majority of this jury was people who simply had nothing else to do....their life revolved around soaps, TV talk shows, and who was visiting their neighbor. They tended to be myopic, petty, and absolutely devoid of the will to think critically. It was both a wonderful and a terrible experience. Thanks to the tireless efforts of one of the other two sane persons on the jury we reached a not guilty verdict....after days of deadlock. After court, the judge asked to meet with us. Lyle Castle, a man who went on to a distinguished career (on an appeals court I think), supported by both parties. He asked us our reasoning, why it took us four days (I think it was 4), thanked us, and then told us had it been trial by judge he would have rendered a not guilty verdict in 30 seconds. The three of us felt vindicated.
I will never seek to get out of jury duty for anything other than a family emergency. This jury was "peers" only to those who live their lives via soaps and springer/oprah. It was frightening to think my fate could be in the hands of a group like most of them. Our last holdout---an older woman (probably 60s)---just kept saying that he was probably guilty of something so it was safer to find him guilty than not guilty. What a genius. As I recall, there were only three people (including me) who were working....on a 12 person jury. I think the system is as good as those running it....and when we all bail out on jury duty, we leave the system to be run by whoever is available. Just my $.02 worth.