Computer lifespan

   / Computer lifespan #61  
Kinda sorta what happened to me. Wife's new computer lost the power supply (only partial) 30 days out. Took me 5 weeks to figure out it was the stupid power supply, because it worked fine for an hour or two, then would reboot, and then reboot in the middle of the boot process. A real duhhhh on my part, but it sure didn't act like a power supply! I went to do a cpu and memory upgrade on the son's game computer, and wound up with a boat anchor, wouldn't recognize the new memory, nor the old. In the meantime, they are using my computer, with the son loading his incessant games on it. By the time I got their's squared away, this one was 'trashed'. I'm still trying to get it all sorted out. Probably the best bet is to save what I can, blow it all off, fdisk/reformat and reload.
I think I need a new tractor!
 
   / Computer lifespan #62  
<font color=blue>they make a great printer {printout quality-wise}... but the CD-RW's are junk</font color=blue>

Actually, they don't make the CD/RW, it's made by somebody else (you have to crack the case to find out who /w3tcompact/icons/crazy.gif). They just stick their name on it. BTW- I have an 8200 series, and it's been working very well.

The GlueGuy
 
   / Computer lifespan #63  
Scruffy,

Wife's girlfriend's computer started acting weird so she decided it must have too much on the hard drive. So she started deleting files. One of them was Explorer. Crashed it out so bad it took me 3 days to fix it. AFTER I got windows up and running and hunted the internet for her sound card and video drivers, I dicovered why the system was acting freaky. The darn battery for the CMOS was about dead and every now and then the BIOS would re set on boot. Hadn't thought about checking the power supply. (Think I'll forget about it right away too, and just concentrate on convincing her to replace the whole box /w3tcompact/icons/laugh.gif. Less work for me).

SHF
 
   / Computer lifespan #64  
<font color=blue>Bird</font color=blue>, I don't blame you! Thirty bucks is money to save when you can!
<font color=blue>SHF</font color=blue>, I must admit, the PSU problem was a strange one. Turns out a capaciter on one bank was leaking (not physically) down, and not supplying enough juice to keep things going when it heated up. First time I had ever run into one 'playing games'. It's a real easy swap out.
 
   / Computer lifespan #65  
Bill,

I made that statement not on just one I had purchased, but on many HP CD-RW units I've installed... They lead the pack as being the fussiest and you can count on buffer underrun's to be the theme of the day for them... {But, I'm happy that yours is working fine for you.../w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif}

On the other hand, the cream of the crop {this week} is Plextor, Yamaha, Ricoh and the newest Acer's...

I read in a trade journal, about 6 or 7 manufacturers{Sanyo being one of the top ones}[off-shore] own about 70 % market share, the rest is divided among about 25 others...

18-35197-JD5205JFMsignaturelogo.JPG
 
   / Computer lifespan #66  
<font color=blue> they make a great printer </font color=blue>

John,

Haven't had but one coaster from my HP CD in the the last 3 years and I use it daily. Maybe you got a bad one. I tried installing a Yamaha CD and couldn't even get it to boot. Swapped for the HP and it came right up.

Their printers are good. The drivers for them are the pits. I'm running a deskjet 970 on LPT1 and a Laserjet 1200 on LPT2. They are supposed to run at the same time (one click print), so that color pictures come off the inkjet and text comes off the laser. Not a chance. Apparently there's an old file in the the deskjet driver and windows won't load the correct file if the inkjet starts first. HP's fix is a patch (dated in August) that is supposed to replace the old file. Didn't work. Ran it twice. Next step is to replace the inkjet driver (dated in July). I doubt that will work either. So, I'll keep running the laser first and when it's done, running the inkjet. Really slows things down. The good news is that the lj 1200 just about runs faster than this computer can drive it. Of course, I was over clocking my old lj 5L with the wrong HP driver /w3tcompact/icons/cool.gif and it was doing pretty good too. Then the software changed and wouldn't work with that driver and the new HP driver wouldn't work with that laser and print runs went from 20 minutes to an hour and hence the 1200. /w3tcompact/icons/crazy.gif

SHF
 
   / Computer lifespan #67  
buffer underruns --- yeah I get that on my hp9300 unless I slow it way down - then it works just fine - we have a lot of hp printers here at the office and almost never have an issue with any of them - that isn't operator error. Last complaint I got about the 4000n was that it wasn't printing anything sent to it. ----- it was out of paper and somebody was too lazy to walk across the room to see why it wasn't printing.---My job would sure be easier if I could cut down on some of the keyboard actuators I have around here.
mike
 
   / Computer lifespan #68  
Interesting viewpoint of WIN XP.

Technology - ZDNet - updated 6:15 PM ET Sep 7 Add to My Yahoo!

Reuters | CNET | Internet Report | ZDNet | TechWeb | NewsFactor | The New York Times | More ...



Friday September 07 01:15 PM EDT
WinXP: an OS for Linux lovers
By Enterprise
Despite all of its automation and graphical splendor, Windows XP (news - web sites) brings its share of quirks to the table. Bill O'Brien believes that Microsoft has finally made an operating system that Linux (news - web sites) users will love.


• Web Surfer Power Tools
• Free MP3 Music Resources
• Hardware Quick Start Guides for Beginners


The day that we've all feared is soon to arrive: Microsoft has finally made an operating system that Linux users will love: Windows XP.

eXPonentially bad
No, it wasn't the 25-character installation code key, or the 52-character OS-generated registration key that needs to be submitted to Microsoft--followed by the responding registration key that needs to be inserted into XP. It was more of just how much XP reminded me of Linux when I installed it.

There sat a system with a 933Mhz Pentium III, 128MB of SDR SDRAM, DVD and CD-RW drives, an Aureal SQ2500 sound card, and an nVidia GeForce2 MX graphics card. Windows 95, 98, and ME had passed through that box without any real incident. Now it was time for XP.

So XP looks a lot like Windows ME (news - web sites) with a pompadour. I can forgive the looks, and there are options to use the more classic Windows GUI. On the other hand, as the upgrade proceeded, I lost the sound card; EZ CD Creator 5.0 was rejected as unusable, making the CD-RW drive just a motorized cup holder (the integrated CD-RW software in XP, although borrowed from Roxio, creates open session CDs that EZ CD 5.0 cannot recognize); and Cyberlink's PowerDVD software was deemed unacceptable, giving the DVD drive no reason to live. See, very Linux-like.

Of course, Microsoft has always sought to distinguish itself from other operating systems and XP did the job. I decided to upgrade to a DDR SDRAM motherboard and a 1GHz Pentium III about six days after the XP upgrade. The hardware swap went well but, when I returned to XP, I was informed that I had only 8 days left to register the software--something I'd already done on the day after I installed it. Apparently, XP tracks little things like that to make sure you're not cloning hard drives and installing the OS into more than one computer. That little bit of paranoia I've, thankfully, never seen in Linux and only experienced once, so far, in Linux software.

I've always maintained that for Linux to become as popular as Windows, someone needs to talk Microsoft into developing a version of its desktop operating system that's as freaky as Linux. When that happens, Windows will drop in popularity to the same level as Linux and the two will finally be on equal footing. By going in a direction that's extremely opposite to Linux (closed source?), Microsoft seems to be headed toward doing just that.

Emulation isn't flattery
On a related note, I predict that XP will send flocks of people over to look at the viability of Linux. (Windows user aren't stupid, they're just a little too complacent.) Unfortunately, most of that flock will shrug and return to Windows because Linux is simply not ready for prime time (at least not the consumer version of prime time), even now. Some will stay, not so much because of Linux itself but rather because they've found a non-Microsoft operating system to satisfy their vitriol and one that can also run Windows and several of its applications via an emulator without slowing down to a crawl. That's not a good thing for Linux.

Don't get me wrong. I like Win4Lin and VMWare (and I have a strong desire to see Wine bear fruit). It's just that emulators--virtual environments, call them what you will--are not good for Linux. They tend to generate their own aura of complacency as well as impeding the development of Linux-specific complementary applications. Why would anyone develop an MS Word-like app for Linux when you can use MS-Word under Win4Lin? (And if you think Linux doesn't need an MS-Word-like application, ask Apple why it needed one for the Macintosh (news - web sites).)

Truthfully, Microsoft should develop a Linux version of its entire office suite so it can put a wrap on all markets, but it has no real incentive to do so. In comparison to almost anything else, the Linux market is relatively small in Microsoft's eyes. Worse still, the legacy of open source has left us with no one representative body that can speak for Linux and cajole Microsoft into doing it, the way Apple wined and dined Microsoft for its Mac.

It's a thorny conundrum. Emulators and open source have become the heart and soul of Linux. What we really need is a single brain to guide Linux's development and associations. The problem there is that any attempt to organize Linux under one corporate mantle would probably breed as much hatred for that company as there is for Microsoft.


What's your take on Windows XP? Think it's as contrary as Linux? Or is it miles ahead of the open source OS? E-mail Bill with your thoughts, or post your opinion in Talkback below.
 
   / Computer lifespan #69  
Re: Counter point.

Hey, all's fair in love & war. Might as well post the contrary view (even though I'm NOT taking sides here. I like to bash M$ as much as the next guy, but I think this ought to be a balanced discussion. The following comes from ZDnet (same folks that presented the above piece).

Why you should upgrade to Windows XP
By John Morris & Josh Taylor, ZDNet Reviews
No matter how you feel about Microsoft, you'll probably like Windows XP (news - web sites).

You guys are Microsoft shills.
Hey, how much is Gates paying you?
Conflict of interest! Microsoft advertises on ZDNet!

OK, now that we've gotten that out of your systems for you, we can report that despite what you Microsoft haters would like to hear, Windows XP is simply the best OS that the company has come up with to date. Granted, with recent releases like Windows Me, the bar wasn't so high. But with the release of Windows XP, Microsoft has managed to build upon the stability of Windows 2000 (news - web sites), while adding a slew of features that home and business users will likely welcome with open arms.

We've recommended the upgrade to our friends and family who ask, assuming that their PCs and peripherals are supported. Of course you can make your own decision after reading ZDNet's review of the new OS. If you want to see how compatible your system is, check Microsoft's rather cumbersome Hardware Compatibility list (Web site), or get your hands on an upgrade advisor CD-ROM that the company will be making available online and in computer stores in the coming weeks.

Who shouldn't upgrade? Basically any users satisfied with their current system performance (including boot-up time, power management, etc.), and who don't add a lot of peripherals to their systems. If you're using a system to surf the Web, send out a couple of e-mails, and do some word processing, you really don't need to bother with the hassle--or expense--of an upgrade.

But you should seriously think about Windows XP if you're a power user or you get annoyed at how long it takes to start up your system or you've found that standby and hibernate have never worked quite right on your PC or you can't tolerate the all-too-frequent system crashes you endure (likely not the case if you're running Windows 2000).

And, if you're frequently adding new peripherals to your system, you should be pleasantly surprised at how simple Windows XP makes it. In fact, a couple of weeks ago we popped in a wireless LAN card without the drivers. Within 60 seconds, we accessed a wireless LAN that our systems had never seen before. Very impressive.

We're both fans of the new user interface, which is cleaner and easier--especially for newbies. Of course, you Windows traditionalists out there can revert to the "classic" look if you so desire. We think home and small business users will welcome new networking wizards that greatly simplify connecting multiple PCs. The built-in firewall is a nice addition, too, especially for cable and DSL users.

On the multimedia front, Windows Media Player (WMP) 8.0 has some nice improvements as well, including support for MP3 encoding (with an optional plug-in), better management of music files, and the automatic downloading of album art when you rip a CD--assuming the album's contained in the All Music Guide database. You can also use WMP 8 for DVD playback, as long as you already have a DVD decoder installed.

If you do decide to upgrade, don't get fixated on whether to buy the Home Edition ($99 upgrade, $199 full) or Professional Edition ($199 upgrade, $299 full). Professional contains everything that Home has, but throws in some additional bells and whistles for the IS crowd, including multiple processor support, and a variety of management features that you'll probably never use at home, and perhaps not even in a small office. But many of the differences between the two versions have less to do with features than with look-and-feel. Microsoft has customized each edition to suit its audience, however, all of the other options are still there so you can always change these default settings to suit your tastes.

Is Windows XP perfect? Of course not. As our loyal readers know by now, we don't have any philosophical problems with Product Activation, and Microsoft has taken some steps to make the process less painful. But we concede that for a relatively small group of users--those that swap system components continuously, such as VARs--the scheme could take a little getting used to. We also wish that Microsoft offered greater discounts to home and small business users seeking to upgrade more than one system. Currently you'll only save $8 to $12 a copy.

Still, Microsoft has turned out a vastly improved operating system. Even if you're not one of the company's biggest fans, don't hate Windows XP just because it's from Microsoft.




The GlueGuy
 
   / Computer lifespan #70  
Re: Counter point.

<font color=blue>Glueguy</font color=blue>, I WOULD have added it in fairness, if I had seen it. Glad you did. I Still won't upgrade to it, as it removes too many abilities for tweaking. The $ side of it is just another aspect I don't like. I also have this desire to keep my own records, and not supply the data to M$ to do with as they please.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2008 Ford F-350 Pickup Truck (A50323)
2008 Ford F-350...
2 Vintage Metal Signs (A48082)
2 Vintage Metal...
2014 FORD F-250 (A50854)
2014 FORD F-250...
2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A48081)
2013 Chevrolet...
UNUSED Heavy-Duty Ratchet Load Binder/Chain Set (A50860)
UNUSED Heavy-Duty...
12in Backhoe Bucket (A50397)
12in Backhoe...
 
Top