czechsonofagun
Elite Member
Too true. In my country peasants didn't get elementary freedom till 1781, and that was just the official step, in reality it was years after that.
It's a good thing that I like bean sandwiches... might be eating alot of them like my dad did in the 30's.
mark
mjarrels said:It's a good thing that I like bean sandwiches... might be eating alot of them like my dad did in the 30's.
mjarrels said:The US was not built on the backs of slaves. Very few people owned slaves in this country.
It is true that most of the white population did not own slaves. But that doesn't change the fact that there were millions of slaves and in the south there were more slaves than whites of any sort. The economy of the south, which was a big part of the US economy, was dependant on slave labor. Granted, they did not build much infrastructure but they did build the agriculture and the economy... but in terms of labor, not design or organization.
Other slaves were used for domestic work. Cooking hardly is building the country. Raising cash crops made some people very wealthy but it did not build the country. A slave owned by a blacksmith surely helped the blacksmith. But build the country?/quote]
There were many skilled slave laborers and artisans, from carpenters, to wainwrights, to barrel makers. Many were often hired out on loan to other people and brought high prices for their skills. You are right, this was a minority population, but they did contribute.
The US was not built by slaves. The US was built by the millions of people who flooded into the country to make a better life for themselves.
I would agree that they did not do it alone, but they were part of thoe millions that flooded here...but not to build a better life for themselves, the built better lives for others. I don't think you can discount their contribution to the birth of this nation even if it was under duress.
Children worked because they had to work.
Well, that is true, but the word 'had' could easily be replaced by the word 'forced' particualrly in the industrialized north where the abuses of child labor were as bad or worse than those of slavery. This chapter in our history is well documented but often ignored for several reasons. This first of which is that the north made slavery a moral issue (which it is) to justify, or at least help with, the War. All the while, their own human rights abuses went ignored. And then the North won. The winners write the history books and the North saw itself as the Virtuous Liberator and as the winner they allowed the cover up its own special horrors and abuses. But child labor in this country was a disgusting abomination that often goes overlooked.
Working in a factory for an adult as well as children was hard, long and dangerous. Because of those abuses we have child labor laws, OSHA, and unions.
Yep, but slaves got their freedom long before any of those things happened.
And think of the abuses of the east coast miners that extended into the 20th century with ridiculously dangerous conditions as well as the 'company store' arrangements that often even involved 'company' money, company homes. It is said that the efficient mining companies got back everything they paid the miners making them little more than slaves.
An interesting aspect of slavery is that if you did a survey of the workers all around the world who occupied the same economic/labor/social class, the slaves in the southern US had by far the highest standard of living. This is not to say that it was good but it was better than the English working class of the time, the Russina peasants under the Czars, the Chinese agrucultural class, the middle European worker. This fact changes nothing in regard to the evils of slavery nor the harsh conditions under which they lived....but it does put it into perspective.
I get this info from a fabulous book which is considered the foremost text on slavery in the US. It is called Roll, Jordon, Roll: The World the Slaves Made by Eugene Genovese. It is a long book, but it is facinating and easy to read. It both confirms the brutality and evil of slavery and also dispells many popular myths.
What's with the doom and gloom about the power grid? Why aren't the electric co.s doing something about it? Every so often I'll see an article about the power grid being overworked, threatening rolling blackouts, and brownouts, etc. Isn't the electric grid just a capitol cost of business expense for the electric companies? Are they waiting for the gubberment to finance the upgrading the the infrastructure required for them to sell their product? I know it will be an expense for the companies, but I would venture to say that they are always certain to make money. They need to spend some of it to keep making money.
Instead of complaining about the grid the electric companies need to fix the grid.
Try and build anew power line. My company has had the money sitting there fora new transmisison line for three years. The greenies will not allow it to be built. End of story. We have all the wind power one would want. We can't get it to the grid. Try and sit a new line near a poly wog. The cost of the materials is cheap compared tot he three freaks who need tot lak tot he ploy wog.
Just build it underground. Don't work yet we are testing new air cooled UG cable it works for a few miles. The heat these lines put off is huge.
It's a good thing that I like bean sandwiches... might be eating alot of them like my dad did in the 30's.
mark
Wonder which is worse, a bean sandwich or a sandwich made of lard and salt?![]()