Sigarms
Super Member
There is a difference between being a stone broke and having family "fight" over assets to survive vs having money and just being a prick IMO.It really is dollars and cents…
I could be wrong, but it doesn't sound like your siblings are hurting for money.
It seems like they don't want to do any of the work and you're the one that was holding the fort down for your mother when she was alive.
I'm sorry, I just don't see what the issue is for you to just keep the house and then leave it in your families name when you pass.
Sorry, but if you're already leaving everything in the world you own to your family, it really does sound like they are being pricks over this.
When my wife's grandparents passed, there was 3 sisters. They took the market value of the home, they split the house 3 ways, and the one sister paid my wifes grandmother and her other sister their share, and then her son bought the house from the sister who bought the house. Simple and everyone thought it was fair.
When everyone can agree that the home is worth over 900K, at that point, unless everyone has to have the money of the house to survive, you buy it, then when you pass, you leave it to your family. Just seems stupid to try to maximize a profit at your expense when in the end, the family is still going to get the house over time.
I might of missed it, but are you currently living there now?