http://croplifefoundation.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/importance-of-herbicides.pdf
I had been following this post for quite some and everybody ridiculing monster Monsanto to the farmer that apply it. Trust me I get it. I don't think any of us would disagree that organic food is healthier. I hear everybody complaining conspiracy, corporate greed, etc but nobody has offered a solution as to how to do it better.
For anybody that cares to read the link posted it shows some of the benefits of herbicides mainly irrigation consumption and soil erosion and compares it to organic/conventional farming. I read this objectively and realize that it doesn't address the health issues related to herbicides which everybody else already covered pretty thoroughly but it does reiterate what I have been saying farmers that use these aren't just interested in maximum yields but also conservation of the their land. Anybody who gardens knows how well their yield is going to be has a large part to do with the dirt they have.
Yes, we are a suspicious lot. :laughing: But there are many precedents for that suspicion where the chemical industry is involved.
The funders of the CropLife Foundation are the same people we don't trust. The disclaimer at the end is IMO laughable.
CropLife Foundation is funded by the following agricultural research and production companies:
AMVAC
Arysta LifeSciences
BASF
Bayer CropScience
Cheminova
Chemtura
Coastal AgroBusiness
Crop Production Services
Dow AgroSciences
Drexel Chemical
Dupont Crop Protection
FMC
Growmark
ISK Biosciences
Makhteshim Agan
MGK
Monsanto
Nichino
Nufarm
PBI Gordon
Spicam Advan
Syngenta Crop Protection
Valent
Winfield Solutions
Our funders have no role in study topics, data collection or preparation of our published materials.
I don't know that distrusting Monsanto and the chemical industry, or not feeling comfortable with the direction agriculture is going in, obligates one to having a better solution. That is a sort of false argument--but a fair question.
Personally, and I think this is true for many others, organic farming is not just about healthier food, it is also about a healthier planet that supports a richness of biodiversity. The two goals are closely intertwined. In plain English, I think our agriculture practices, both in the production and consumption side of things, are collectively abusing the planet and we do and will pay a price for that in terms of human health and overall quality of life.
Think about the dirt that you want to protect. It isn't really just dirt, it is an entire biome of bacteria, fungus, and whatever else that makes dirt able to nourish plant life. Sterile dirt doesn't grow much of anything until it is repopulated with those necessary living things. It is literally alive, as I'm sure you know. From what I have read, limited I grant you, nobody really has a total understanding of the inter-relationships of the living things in dirt. I don't think all of them have exact names and identifications even.
Look at the comments and recommendations in this forum that deal with the interfaces between us and the rest of the life on this planet. There are two main tools that can be reduced to: spray and shoot. While those may be unavoidable in some cases, they certainly shouldn't be the only tools in the box, or the tools of first choice if we want to preserve anything like a natural environment.
I think we do have better solutions at hand but they are not going to be profitable for Monsanto, and they aren't always amenable to large-scale agriculture as we know it today. I think we need to return to having more people employed in food production, more locally sourced foods, and more natural growing conditions.
We need something like the farms of the 1940's and 50's that produced both meats and grains in a way that made sense, and they weren't running to the ag store for chemicals all the time either. Not that they were perfect by any means, but I think we tossed out the baby with the bath water.
I don't think that will make food tremendously more expensive either. We spend a lot on food, and a lot of what we spend isn't going into our local economies supporting local people. So while large-scale ag may produce cheaper foodstuffs, at the same time it impoverishes rural communities--they have been dropping like flies for 20-30 years now. It's not a free lunch.
This matters in people's value systems and their overall quality of life. The people here and elsewhere who value rural life based upon close-knit communities, closeness to the land, self-reliance and so on, they've traded that for a barrel of chemicals and a bag of GM seeds. Plain and simple, Monsanto is not their friend.