Tom_Veatch
Platinum Member
cp1969 said:Oxygen doesn't produce power. Fuel makes power.
...
It is true that oxygen (alone) doesn't produce power. But, it is not true that fuel (alone) makes power, either. As a point in fact, perhaps pedantic, the combustion of fuel in oxygen doesn't make power, it releases energy. The function of the engine is to transform that energy into work and power.
The maximum energy that can be released in the combustion process is when all available oxygen combines with all available fuel. If there is either unburned fuel or free oxygen remaining in the exhaust stream, above some minimum amount determined by the combustion efficiency of the particular engine, additional usable energy could be obtained by increasing the fuel/oxygen ratio in the cylinder.
An engine can be "de-rated" or limited/governed by restricting the amount of fuel that can be supplied such that it develops significantly less power at low altitude than it is capable of developing. If that is the case, then as altitude increases (manifold pressure decreases) it is possible that a constant power output could be developed by increasing the fuel/oxygen ratio (constant fuel flow rate/decreasing oxygen) until the point is reached at which all available fuel burns in all available oxygen. Note that, due to combustion inefficiencies, "available" doesn't necessarily mean "all that is present".
The point I'm trying to make is that an engine running an excessively lean mixture at sea level can maintain it's power output up to some maximum altitude where the fuel/oxygen ratio is optimum. Above that altitude the power output will decrease with increasing altitude.
But, it that is the case for a particular engine, it means the engine at low altitude was developing less power than it was capable of producing. In general, if an engine is running at it's maximum power at sea level, it's power output, whether it be Diesel or Otto Cycle, will decrease as the mass of oxygen in the cylinder decreases with altitude.