Pixguy
Elite Member
Of course they are going to state their case in their light which is more money for them. However, it costs the broadcaster nothing. Dish and other providers pick it up off the air and rebroadcast it and if anyone pays for that it is them. The broadcaster has a license to use the public's bandwidth to broadcast and their advertising income already covers their costs and profit. By charging the other providers who rebroadcast even more money they are trying to pass along more costs along to us the customers unfairly which is pure profit for the broadcaster. Dish or the other's aren't going to take it out of their pockets as all costs are passed along to consumers who eventually have to pay for it. The point is why should I a member of the public pay for something that others receive out of the air for free? Are we not part of the public too? The sooner everyone gets that simple fact though their heads the more other stuff will make more sense. Taxes on business for example are all past along and eventually paid by us the end consumer at the end of the chain. A tax on business is simply a disguised tax on we the people. There simply are no free lunches. No part of any product or service chain is going to absorb the costs for anything, they will simply pass it along to us to pay for instead. It's just that simple. If anything they will add a profit surcharge on top of it and we end up paying even more. Let's keep it simple. Broadcasters are in business and licensed to use public bandwidth to broadcast so they should be made to stick to their knitting.
Well said, I've thought the same thing, why is my local broadcaster holding out for more money? Pure greed.
I was talking to a Maine fast food restaurant owner the other day where the minimum wage went up to $9 this year and $10 next year. He figures it's costing $.19 per item to cover the wage increase. You figure that he's raising $.19 ? Nope, $.25 ea item. Greed? Yup and it rolls downhill to us, the consumer.