Have been pouring over all of the great info on this site for weeks, gathering info, saving my pennies and starting to put together plans for a new barn.
Am thinking of a plain pole barn with dirt floor now, slab, insulation, elec, etc later. Clear span roof trusses are certainly appealing!
I really like the do it yourself approach as my finances are limited. I've built a couple steel framed barns in the past but I'm leaning towards wood this round as I believe that they are easier to insulate.
I made a note of this site that has lots of free plans available for download. Thanks to whoever posted the URL for this web page!
I looked over all of the wooden truss plans that were sized to fit my needs. Most used plywood gussets at the joints for the trusses. The thing that I didn't care for about using plywood gussets is that they require lots of nails to handle the forces and cutting out the gusset plates would take quite a bit of time. In addition to taking lots of time to drive, I get nervous putting too many nails in a small area. In the middle of the night I'd be listening for the wood to split under a heavy load! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
On the other hand, this set of plans uses split ring connectors instead of gusset plates.
So each joint would simply have two or more 2xX's overlapping, with a ring connector in between and a single 1/2" bolt through the center to hold the sandwich together. In my opinion, this would be quite a bit less work than cutting a pair of gusset plates and driving 20-30 nails per joint!
I like that idea!
The only nit about putting in a split ring connector is that you have to drill a 3/8" circular groove (like a hole saw would cut) in the pieces to be joined. The connector sits in this groove. So this is a little bit of work and also the groove reduces the cross section of the 2xX (which I'm confident that the plans take into account).
One other shear developer in the same family as the split ring connector is the spike grid.
This beauty is kind of like a toothed mending plate that sits between instead of outside a joint as do the plates the big guys use to put together lightweight wood trusses. And unlike the later, the spike grid can be installed by you and I with no special tools. Put it in place, tighten the bolt and the teeth are forced into the members being joined. And the spike grid does not reduce the cross section of the members being joined. Another plus!
Also I would bet that the spike grid would do a better job of holding the joint rigid around the Z axis than would a split ring connector where the two members could possibly rotate around the connector.
Has anybody had any experience with either of these connectors? They sure look like a lot less hassle than home made plywood gusset plates.
Fun stuff!
Mark
Am thinking of a plain pole barn with dirt floor now, slab, insulation, elec, etc later. Clear span roof trusses are certainly appealing!
I really like the do it yourself approach as my finances are limited. I've built a couple steel framed barns in the past but I'm leaning towards wood this round as I believe that they are easier to insulate.
I made a note of this site that has lots of free plans available for download. Thanks to whoever posted the URL for this web page!
I looked over all of the wooden truss plans that were sized to fit my needs. Most used plywood gussets at the joints for the trusses. The thing that I didn't care for about using plywood gussets is that they require lots of nails to handle the forces and cutting out the gusset plates would take quite a bit of time. In addition to taking lots of time to drive, I get nervous putting too many nails in a small area. In the middle of the night I'd be listening for the wood to split under a heavy load! /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
On the other hand, this set of plans uses split ring connectors instead of gusset plates.
So each joint would simply have two or more 2xX's overlapping, with a ring connector in between and a single 1/2" bolt through the center to hold the sandwich together. In my opinion, this would be quite a bit less work than cutting a pair of gusset plates and driving 20-30 nails per joint!
I like that idea!
The only nit about putting in a split ring connector is that you have to drill a 3/8" circular groove (like a hole saw would cut) in the pieces to be joined. The connector sits in this groove. So this is a little bit of work and also the groove reduces the cross section of the 2xX (which I'm confident that the plans take into account).
One other shear developer in the same family as the split ring connector is the spike grid.
This beauty is kind of like a toothed mending plate that sits between instead of outside a joint as do the plates the big guys use to put together lightweight wood trusses. And unlike the later, the spike grid can be installed by you and I with no special tools. Put it in place, tighten the bolt and the teeth are forced into the members being joined. And the spike grid does not reduce the cross section of the members being joined. Another plus!
Also I would bet that the spike grid would do a better job of holding the joint rigid around the Z axis than would a split ring connector where the two members could possibly rotate around the connector.
Has anybody had any experience with either of these connectors? They sure look like a lot less hassle than home made plywood gusset plates.
Fun stuff!
Mark