rjkobbeman
Platinum Member
Let's look at it this way...
If we are say 500 lbs over a GCWR of 5000 lbs, that is 10% over. Add a 500 lbs fudge factor and we could be 20% over.
When dealing with low ratings like this, small amounts by weight are large amounts by proportion.
Then we get into axle ratings. I would put money that the rear axle would be overloaded. 10-15% of trailer weight is a good tongue weight. Let's assume that the BX, accessories and trailer weighs 1800 lbs. That would mean 180-200 lbs on the tongue, which is almost 50% of the payload capacity of 675 lbs. Which, once you figure in the leverage of it being at the end of the vehicle will be significantly more on the rear axle. I would guess this is an underestimate of the tongue weight considering the trailer and load. Add in stuff, passengers and such, and there is no way you can even come close to the mfg ratings.
The element is on the CR-V platform, which is a beefy Civic. I wouldn't trust the brakes on that to be able to handle a trailer that is 50% of the vehicle weight.
Basically, that is a rolling hazard.
And since it is 2000 lbs over GCWR, that is 40% over GCWR. I also wouldn't trust those brakes to handle a trailer that is 50% of the vehicle weight. I really, really wouldn't trust those brakes to handle a trailer that is 75% (4000 * .75 = 3000) of the vehicle weight.