Domush
Platinum Member
I should have verified the pulse width prior to the original calculation.
Doing some reading on modern electric fences, the pulse width is 10 microseconds, not 3 milliseconds, which makes far more sense, and also explains the high amperage rates, as the shorter time span will increase the effective discharge rate.
For comparison, 10 milliseconds is the pulse width of a modern defibrillator (not something you want as a 'warning' device). Which means a fence shock is one thousandth as long.
One of those small error, big difference things which tend to be the difference between cows grazing where they should and a widow having a Darwin plaque on the wall and some pre-cooked meat.
Joshua, you can put that chicken down, now.
Doing some reading on modern electric fences, the pulse width is 10 microseconds, not 3 milliseconds, which makes far more sense, and also explains the high amperage rates, as the shorter time span will increase the effective discharge rate.
For comparison, 10 milliseconds is the pulse width of a modern defibrillator (not something you want as a 'warning' device). Which means a fence shock is one thousandth as long.
One of those small error, big difference things which tend to be the difference between cows grazing where they should and a widow having a Darwin plaque on the wall and some pre-cooked meat.
Joshua, you can put that chicken down, now.