JD 3038e is a turbo and a mere 38hp.
The first 1,000 feet of altitude is the base line.
At 2,000 feet 3% power loss.
At 3,000 feet 6% power loss.
At 4,000 feet 9% power loss.
At 4,000 feet 45-hp engine will generate about 41-hp.
Temperature affects power output from a normally aspirated engine too. Hot intake air is a tad thinner than cold/cool air.
So take these calculations as approximate.
Normally I recommend buying more horsepower at purchase. But in your situation, more horsepower requires the complexity of a turbocharger. I am dedicated to simplicity in tractor decisions.
Are you sure there will not be a change from a three cylinder diesel engine to a four cylinder diesel engine for the added power? There is often an increase of one combustion cylinder in tractors of this power. Check it.
I prefer three cylinder engines over four cylinder engines of about same power output.
What PTO driven applications do you foresee? The two most common PTO applications which really need power are Rotary Cutters (AKA Bush Hogs) and blowing snow. In snow, power determines width of implement and distance snow can be blown.
Agreed, but here in the early stages I am finding the turbo does take a step up from what I'd be getting if I was at sea level.Another feature to consider is your fuel efficiency, the turbo'ed engine will not lose as much fuel efficiency as a non turbo,
especially with the hot dry air in Montana in the summer at 4000 ft, it would not be as noticeable in the winter.
Also in general I'd just as soon have a turbo'ed engine most any time over the same size engine without one.
I want to stay on the smaller side to keep potential tractor maneuverable in the timber but not so small it is ineffective...
Research steering gears. Kubota uses higher cost beveled steering gears in most, perhaps all, Kubota compact tractors. Tractors with bevel gears in the steering turn much sharper than those without. You do not want to buy a small tractor only to find it requires a greater turn radius than a larger tractor you had considered. Turning radius is usually included in tractor specification data. If turning radius is omitted it is a clue.......
More to look into!
Have you started to spreadsheet tractor specifications for the machinery under consideration?
Think more about bare tractor weight than tractor "size" Bare tractor weight allows you to compare apples to apples in tractor specifications. For most tractor applications, bare tractor weight is more important than tractor horsepower.
Safe hillside operation demands more tractor weight than level land operation. Heavier tractors start with a wider wheel stance. Heavier tractors usually have adjustable rear wheel spreads; wide rear wheel spreads improve tractor stability more than any other variable.
Four wheel drive is essential on hillsides. Four wheel drive supplies increased traction and braking. When descending slopes 4-WD augments rear brakes as tractor weight shifts forward, decreasing rear tire grip. Tractors do not have front brakes.
Compact tractors optimized for hill work have liquid installed in the rear tires rather than air. "Loaded" tires are filled 50% to 75% with liquid, which lowers the tractor's center-of-gravity, increasing rollover resistance. "Loading" two compact tractor rear tires increases tractor weight 300 pounds to 800 pounds over weight of identical two tires inflated with air. Some prefer to ballast rear wheels with iron wheel weights rather than tire liquids.
When considering a tractor purchase, bare tractor weight first, tractor horsepower second and (narrowly) rear wheel ballast third.
My place is on a hill with some steep sections so that is the main reason I am looking at a higher HP rig. I've borrowed a neighbors 30hp Kubota and it struggled to make it up some sections of my drive while pulling the land plane.
Interesting story.
Was the Kubota 2-WD or 4-WD? Were rear tires "loaded" with liquid or inflated with air?
Did the Kubota have a Loader mounted? Was there dirt in the Loader bucket to hold the front end down, increasing traction with the front wheels for sure and possibly the rear wheels as well?
A LPGS is a long, ground engagement implement. On a steep hill it would certainly unload weight from the front wheels. I suppose with implement drag, LPGS could shift where the rear tire patches contacted the ground, altering rear wheel traction as well.
You may not have operated the HST transmission properly. Did you engage HST/LOW range or try to ascend in HST/MED or HST/HIGH? HST requires some counter-intuitive technique ascending hills.
Hmmm........
Interesting story. Horsepower may or may not have been the problem.