I know this is a subject that's tired, overanalyzed and beaten to death, but I've got to ask it... With a 2320, you get a quick-disconnect bucket. It's handy. For forks. But there's no plow assembly available through John Deere. The Curtis is expensive and seems overkill - both in price and weight.
So, I keep coming back to this:
http://www.johnnyproducts.com/images/Johnny-Plow-Sr/JplowSr 010.jpg
But, I'm concerned that the 2320 is too light to handle even a 60" blade mounted a couple feet ahead of the front tires. Should I be concerned? I seem to recall people complaining about sub-compacts and compacts not being able to handle this style plow. I just really like the idea of keeping my FEL on and cleaning up with a bucket. I envisioned running the angle function to the hydraulic MMM lift.
I suppose I could buy it, adapt it for the loader, and if it didn't work out then I could get the JD quick-hitch and mount it to that. Then I'd end up with an extra 6" of blade than the factory plow blade.
Thoughts?
So, I keep coming back to this:
http://www.johnnyproducts.com/images/Johnny-Plow-Sr/JplowSr 010.jpg
But, I'm concerned that the 2320 is too light to handle even a 60" blade mounted a couple feet ahead of the front tires. Should I be concerned? I seem to recall people complaining about sub-compacts and compacts not being able to handle this style plow. I just really like the idea of keeping my FEL on and cleaning up with a bucket. I envisioned running the angle function to the hydraulic MMM lift.
I suppose I could buy it, adapt it for the loader, and if it didn't work out then I could get the JD quick-hitch and mount it to that. Then I'd end up with an extra 6" of blade than the factory plow blade.
Thoughts?