Oaktree
Super Member
At 29K for an entry level 4WD I thought that the new Rangers were affordably priced, I just found the concept of another addition to the line to be intriguing. If it is indeed a unibody and can pull down an honest 30 mpg, I will consider buying one.
I'm not sure a unibody truck would be rugged enough for what I'd want it for, but the new Ranger (or for that matter Colorado/Canyon) are just about the right size. Yeah, they're bigger than the previous models (which I thought were a little too small), but still not the monsters the full size trucks are. I just don't need that kind of capacity.
Don't really want a new truck, but when it comes time to replace the Dakota (I figure 5 yr. or so), I'd consider used ones of either of the above.
My '83 and '85 Rangers both got 23.5 consistently, with the 2.8 V6, manual shift. My '04 gets 17 if the wind is right and I put an egg under the accelerator, generally it gets around 15-16. Going down the interstate with a 5' tiller in the back I barely got in 14 mpg... not much of an economy truck.
I got 20-ish with my old '88 Dakota (3.9 V6/5 speed), I'm lucky to get 17 with my '02 (4.7 V8/automatic). Strangely, I don't notice a big difference between around town/highway driving or whether or not I'm pulling a trailer. Biggest difference seems to be summer vs winter tires.