Front end loaders dangerous

   / Front end loaders dangerous #21  
You may be right. Of interest here is the load's torque around the front axle. So although the maximum load is reduced by extending the loader arm, the distance of the load beyond the front axle is increased more than enough to make up for the smaller load. Wish I would have kept my mouth shut.

RaT makes a good point about the curl too.
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #22  
<font color="blue">Wish I would have kept my mouth shut.
</font>

jmc, I just wish I COULD keep my mouth shut, a sentiment probably shared by all who read my posts. /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

This is a tricky little physics problem, and when I first read your post my first thought was "Dang, he's right". Your point might still hold true at maximum loader lifting capacity, but my brain's clutch is slipping, so I can't even tell you why. Anyway, let's call it a draw - I still like the gist of your point.

Ditto on RaT's point about curling force. My first reaction was disagreement, but when I thought about it, it gets down to how the arms are set up on the QA adapter, so I think I get it now.

I'm still thinking of eliminating the QA on my 853 loader, but I'm having doubts about whether I can actually increase the curling force no matter how I position the loader attachment points on my grapple. Maybe a little, but the geometry of the QA adapter linkage is pretty slick (mine's the Kubota version). Looking at it, you wouldn't think it has enough mechanical advantage for what it does, but it will curl a 2,000 lb. log like nobody's business. It reminds me of the bumblebee that doesn't know that according to the laws of physics, it's unable to fly. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

If I ever do eliminate the QA, it would be mainly just to eliminate its own weight from the equation. OK, my brain hurts now, I'd better stop thinking - I think I'll go see if I can find a nice "Gilligan's Island" marathon on the boob tube LOL

Lastly, even though I have a feeling we were both right, those were some brave words you spoke ... "I think you might be right". Right back at you. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #23  
My motto when using the FEL is "LOW & SLOW".

Keep the loaded bucket as low as you can without dumping the material and proceed VERY SLOWLY. Keep it in low range to be sure you don't accidently make the tractor "jump" when you have a loaded bucket. The tractor tends to "buck" and then stop suddenly and will tilt toward the front.

Tim
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #24  
Another $.02 on extending the lever arm with a QA bucket, just to muddy the water a bit and add to the fun.

The loader is connected to the tractor at a different point than the cylinders are connected to the loader. Adding length to the lever will impact the two by a different percentage. If you look at a loader arm, there is a cylinder for lifting the arm and a second one for curling the attachment. Each has it's own fulcrum and point at which force acts on the lever. Both are different from where the loader is attached to the tractor. You have moments on the longitudinal axis of the tractor as well as on the vertical axis. My loader attaches to the tractor about a foot below where the cylinder that lifts the arms attaches to the stationary element of the loader frame. This results in different torque moments acting about the roll center, center of mass, and the different axes of rotation.

Yeah, it makes for an interesting physics problem, but also one that is unique to each tractor/loader setup since the distances and angles involved will differ from one application to another.
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #25  
I am still confused, do people think having the tires filled is enough? Or do you also need to have your box blade or some other ballast on the back as well?
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #26  
My rear tires are filled with "juice" and while that helps, I definitely don't think that it is sufficient ballast for safety and stability.

Think about the physics of it; my FEL can lift about 1000# (not counting its own weight) and the bucket center is probably about 3' in front of the ground contact point of the front wheels. Assuming that the weight of the tractor itself is approximately evenly balanced between front and rear unfilled wheels, that still leaves a full FEL bucket moving the center of gravity substantially more forward then normal even with filled rear wheels. I for excavation work or carrying heavy FEL loads, I normally have either the BH or boxblade on the rear. If I need to maneuver in tight quarters, I still put the ballast box (which has about 500# of paving stones) on the 3ph. If I have to lift something at or near the FEL's limit with my pallet forks on (which puts the FEL load further out beyond the front of the FEL, I put the BH on, curl the largest boulder I can find in its bucket and extend the boom and dipperstick as far out to the rear (and low) as feasible. With that ballast, I have been able to take 1000# implement pallets off of 18 wheelers while maintaining tractor front and rear firmly on the ground.

I have found that a helpful (albeit imprecise) test of stability, when carrying a large weight in the FEL is to add my weight to
it and see if there is any tendency for the rear end to lighten up. It the rear end moves perceptibly, I need more ballast behind.

Sorry for the length of this, but your question raises a serious safety issue. An unstable tractor is serious danger both for the operator and anyone else in the vicinity. I don't think that there is such a thing as excessive caution when carrying heavy loads.

Hope this helps.
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #27  
Thanks for the help, I really have no interest in ever tipping over my tractor, so I think I will try to run with the BB on most of the time, for the FEL work.....
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #28  
Hiya Ryan, how goes it? OK, here's my take on it. The upsides to ballast are obvious, so have as much as possible while weighing the downsides. The downsides: the heavier the tractor: 1) the more ground damage it does, 2) the more time and money you need to add weights, attachments, etc. 3) the harder it is for the engine to move it around (traction goes up of course). Please don't take this as anti-ballast, it's not. It's just a look at all sides of the issue. For example, I didn't fill my tires because I need to be as light as possible, but I can get heavy if I want to because I have front and rear grapples.

Then take into account that everyone's situation can be different, so there there are universal guidelines but no universal rules. Time and time again you will hear of dealers who will not sell a tractor with a loader unless the tires are filled. A friend of mine practically called me an idiot for not filling my tires because "the farmer next door says you're a fool if you don't". I have grapples on the front and back of my tractor, and operate in a "target rich" environment where I can almost always grab something with the rear grapple to balance any size load in the front grapple. It all depends, but it's not rocket science - only physics. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

That is not a slam on physicists of course, just pointing out that if you sit down and think really hard about what makes sense to you, for the tractor that you own, for how and where you operate it, under what conditions, for what attachments you have, and what you do with them, with everything that has been said in this thread alone, I would think that anyone can figure out what makes sense for him.

One last thought: I was carrying some pretty big logs out of a back yard tonight with my front grapple, in the dark, traversing a snowy slope that pitched toward a ravine, while trying to avoid the house, while also having to lift the loader up about five feet on each trip to keep from flattening this stupid little bush. I had it in 4wd of course, with a big log in the rear grapple for counter-weight, and my turfs were doing a darn good job even without the chains on. (We're getting 10" tonight, so I guess they'll go on tomorrow).

And no, I didn't wipe out. Everything went fine, loaded about 10 nice big hemlock logs onto the crane/log truck. The point of my story is that I was thinking about this thread as I went through varying degrees of tipping over as I went about my business. I start to tip over every day that I use my tractor, it's part of using a tractor. You're almost always going to start to tip over at some point, no matter how much ballast you have. It struck me that one of the big keys is just to be as aware as possible of what is going on with your tractor. And don't fear tipping over, just learn how to avoid it. I haven't tipped over yet in 570 hours of sometimes hairy operation on all different types of terrain and ground conditions, but I have probably started to tip over more than a thousand times. Using a loader on a tractor and starting to tip is a lot like walking - with each step, you're basically just falling until your foot hits the ground.

You just have to develop a feel for your tractor, become a part of it, feel its every movement in the seat of your pants, and don't be afraid of it, just respect and understand the forces at work. When you know your tractor really well, the experience of starting to tip will become second nature, to the point where it will probably take some good old-fashioned bad luck or something truly unforeseeable to make you go over. Of course, I could fall prey to good old-fashioned stupidity or absent-mindedness any day now too, there's always that.

And be especially cautious when you're in a very vulnerable position, like when I have my loader at its maximum height as I'm loading a 2,000 lb. log onto my log truck. Little room for errors, so don't make any. Be sure of your footing, watch out for holes, rocks, obstacles, slope and terrain. And get ready to drop the loader FAST. Have an "escape route" planned out. Pay attention, feel the movements that your inner ear are detecting and sending to your brain. BE the tractor, as Chevy Chase would say.

Because I climb trees (my record height is 110 feet in a BIG white pine) people often ask me, "Aren't you afraid of heights?". I tell them "No, I'm not really "afraid" of heights - but I am concerned about them". I'll close (do i detect loud cheering? /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif) with this: don't be afraid of using your loader, but be very, very concerned about it.
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #29  
I did not need my tires ballasted on my hilly property when mowing. I also had the loader off when mowing. Between my 84" mower, my hills and the tractors HP, it was about the right setup. If I had ballasted the tires (which I tried), negotiating the terrain always was slower with the added 1200 or so pounds the rears added. When using the loader, I always had my 1000lb box scraper on back and I was simply never able to tip the tractor forward even when heaped with my toothbar on. Tipping a tractor forward has never been a concern, its the sideways that is always a concern. When I have to carry a load in the bucket on the side of a hill I carry the bucket low and even lower my boxscraper down. I always have my hand on the joystick ready to to drop the loader. I have done it several times out of need, but practiced many times to get the habit burned into my head. The funny thing is, I am on hills that other folks won't mow which seems to be just as natural as can be for me. I am sure though that my first times mowing on the sides of the hills made me a bit anxious.
 
   / Front end loaders dangerous #30  
I bought a used Kubota 2500 with FEL. Was having some flats, so started adding slime to front tires, then to back. On the 2nd back tire, got water instead of air. I do not know why only 1 tire had water. Do not knwo if I need water in back tires. In Texas, and keep 5 foot bushog on back at all times.

Do you have flats with water? Anyway, if I fill with air is tip over weight the only problem? I remember a new Kubota dealer telling me I needed water in back tires to operate FEL better. Need some input.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

John Deere 6430 Side Arm Tractor (A51573)
John Deere 6430...
1271 (A50490)
1271 (A50490)
2009 Skeeter SL190 19ft Boat with 21ft Boat Trailer (A51694)
2009 Skeeter SL190...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
2012 UNVERFERTH 6-INCH FRONT WHEEL SPACER KIT FOR 10 BOLT HUB (A52748)
2012 UNVERFERTH...
2015 JEEP PATRIOT (A51406)
2015 JEEP PATRIOT...
 
Top