GARAGE PROJECT

   / GARAGE PROJECT #1  

B964

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Messages
16
Location
Upstate New York
I plan on a 32x 36 building. It took 24 15 yard trucks of fill,because of slope. The top soil was scraped off and it was vibratory rolled on each layer. The fill is like concrete now, I barely could pound in some stakes. The code here requires either a 4 foot frost wall or a monolithic pour. I will most likely go monolithic. I know it is a little small but only needs are for two trucks and near future tractor. I have a 12x24 shed for ATV's and other lawn stuff. Any opinions on the concrete are welcome. Having trouble with camera so no pics yet.
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #2  
I have never liked the monolithic pours and I feel that you would be better off with the 4' foundation wall in the long run. Just because a building code allows it, doesn't mean that it is the best method. Personally, I would have rather seen you build on the slope with a full basement and saved the money that the fill cost and put that into the foundation. Then used pre cast concrete slabs for the second story floor. That way, you would have the best of both worlds. An entrance in the rear and one at grade level. Double the square footage without double the costs.
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT
  • Thread Starter
#3  
I am not sold on the mono idea yet either. I like your two story idea but did not have enough slope for it. Alot of the fill is driveway to build site to be level with road, house and to have proper drainage.
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #4  
I have a monolithic pour of 48' x 60' without problems for 7 years now. I don't have the freeze problems you have but the primary requirement for such a slab is using #3 rebar 12" or 16" o.c. each way instead of mesh. Good Luck
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #5  
B964,

There is nothing wrong with a monolithic foundation, provided you take into account, all of the factors of your situation.
No matter what type of foundation you use, you need to have the footing, (bottom of the outside portion of a mono slab, or spread footing under a foundation wall), bearing on undisturbed soil. Since I don't know how much of a slope your site is on, I can't say how much you will need to excavate, at any of the four sides, to achieve this.
You may, or may not, be required to provide a soils test, and an engineered foundation plan, in order to get a building permit. Around here, on an accessory building, (not for residential occupation, and less than X # of sq. ft.), an engineered foundation is not required. In your case, it would be cheap insurance.
A soils test, at the depth of your foundation, would tell you the size of the footing surface needed, and could save you a lot of future problems. An alternative to excavating down deep enough to get a good bearing surface for the foundation, is to have piers/caisons drilled to get down to adequate bearing. Usually less costly than excavating the entire foundation, if you have to go very deep.
It is common to pour floors/flatwork, over structural, compacted fill. With adequate reinforcing, and since the dead load is spread over such a large area, when done right, there are few problems. Since a foundation must support all of its' own weight, plus that of the entire building, and with a monolithic, anything sitting close to the outside of the building, on the floor, snow loads, wind forces, etc.
Pouring over fill is not a good idea, and in most jurisdictions, will not be acceptable to the building dept.
Check with your local inspector, and go from there.
I have a similar site that I have begun excavation on, for a future 30' X 40' garage shop. Into the hill I am on very firm soft rocky soil, but the other two sides have 4 to 5 feet of fill. So I am planning on having caisons poured under the two sides where all of the fill is.
Hope this long rambling bunch of noise, helps you in some way.
Good luck with your project,

DT
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT
  • Thread Starter
#6  
I was thinking of some type of modified mono. Maybe a little deeper edge and thicker floor. You don't have a freeze problem down there, but why if you search web for foundation repair info it comes up with 100's in TX area?
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #7  
I have zip, zero, zilcho experience pouring foundations. What are the problems you typically see with a monolithic pour versus other foundation types? My neighbor and I are planning a garage for his back yard and we were thinking monolithic was the way to go. Can y'all educate me on this one? In my area, code rquires a 30" depth to get below the frost line. Thanks everyone.
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #8  
about 2/3 of the way down on this web site, you will see a good drawing of the monolithic design. web page
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #9  
In response to this question I PM'd to Junkman:

"Junkman, thanks for the info. I know what a monolithic foundation looks like (guess I shouldn't have said I knew zero). I'm just wondering why some people don't like 'em. What kind of problems do you typically experience with monolithic that you wouldn't with poured or block walls and a floating slab? Thanks again for letting me tap into that vast wealth of information we all know as the Junkman!"

He said:

"I have seen monolithic pours go bad when the ground below is "porous". By this, I mean that the ground is disturbed and when it settles, it will leave voids under the concrete. I think that if you were to do a monolithic pour, that it would be best to scrape off the topsoil and then dig the perimeter and pour on top of the ground. Most people tend to disturb the earth too much and this leads to problems. You might say that it is a personal choice. With a foundation wall, your building wall is above grade and with a monolithic pour, the side wall is usually attached to the slab at grade. This leads to problems of walls rotting at the bottom. I don't believe that you save any costs of materials in the end, but just a small time savings by having the floor poured first instead of last."

Couldn't you avoid the problem of rotting sill plates by just pouring\forming a higher and/or a thicker slab?
 
   / GARAGE PROJECT #10  
The slabs that have a lot of problems are on the Texas coastal gumbo. It has a high clay content that expands greatly with hydration. They dont build, and they should, self supporting slabs such as a post tension one. My soil here is deep sand and very stable. When we lived on the gulf coast, the house we built was on bell bottom piers footed down 16'. 42 piers and it did not move even through a flood.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2024 iDrive TDS-2010H Pro Jack M2 Electric Trailer Jack System (A48081)
2024 iDrive...
2005 International 4300 Heil Dump Truck (A50323)
2005 International...
2016 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A48082)
2016 Ford Explorer...
2016 Tracker Marine 14ft Jonboat with 16ft Boat Trailer (A48082)
2016 Tracker...
John Deere 5090E Tractor with Loader Prep Package, 2 Rear Remotes, Warranty Until 2028 (A51039)
John Deere 5090E...
1500 Gallon Water / Chemical Tank (A50860)
1500 Gallon Water...
 
Top