Osprey,
Alot of good opinions & answers on the tech side. My thoughts are purely personel. I have always been a GM fan(i'm in the upper 40's). My observations of GM's decline started in the 80's. The big 3 were all turning out ho-hum vehs. When Ford and Chrysler began to change the look and styling and tech end of their stuff, it seemed to me that GM stayed in the same darn rut that they are still in today. Good lord, they just built a PT Cuiser copy....what, only 10 or so years AFTER the original PT /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif !Now there is a regular brainstorm of a marketing coup(somewhere deep inside the GM design plant, two dork marketing designers gave theselves a high 5 /forums/images/graemlins/ooo.gif) ! This is just one of the disapointing examples of their lackluster styling. The "retro style move" has been going strong for many years, and yet GM has yet to give us poor slobbering muscle car fans one tiny morsel. Heck, i just thought for sure they would appeal to the family guy with a retro '55 chev 4dr, or a 40's Buick to counter the Chrysler 300......nope. How about a Camaro? and yes i have seen the '07 pic's and it looks nothing like a '60's Camaro(just an opinion). For me, GM just squandered a golden opportunity in the retro market, and continues to do so /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif.
It was almost like the GM designers quit and went to work for the other "2". I still like their trucks, but i can honestly say, nothing in the way of a GM car has peaked my interest in a very long time. And then we come to the price end where every time i shopped(trucks) it was GM-most, Ford-Middle, and Dodge-lowest. I have owned all 3, and i just don't see a 5K difference between the GM & Dodge. In the last few years the prices may have come closed together.
I wonder if we (the GM fans) could hire the same fellow that slapped Mr. Chryler into the 22'nd century to get a good running start and................. /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif
ok....no more whinning /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif!
RD