EE_Bota
Elite Member
My shot, without reading any other replies:
1)There is no other side of infinity. Infinity is infinite. If we choose to confuse near infinity with actual infinity, then all bets are off.
2)Minutes are fragile things. Time is mostly conceived by humans due to our feeble state, which consists of taking in energy in higher forms, and using some for our own purposes, and wasting the rest. If we were not bound to this thermodynamic truth regarding our existence, we probably would not have conceived of time to begin with.
Hawking in his book "A Brief History of Time" brings up two or more "arrows" of time which, and it has been years, but one was cosmological and one was thermodynamic.
"Before the big bang" would be before either arrow of time, such that we would understand them. As an observer, where are you? One can conceive thought experiments to solve practical problems without resorting to full blown calculations, but all such experiments I have ever conceived allow for me, to observer, to exist somewhere. You, as an observer, were either in the pre-Big Bang singularity, such that you can report what time looked like (very unlikely) or you were not in existence at all, since there is no place to be outside the Big Bang singularity.
What happened before the big bang is presumed by me to be a nonsensical question, but by no means a dumb question. But, just as I think I have a grasp, I will read something different which seems to indicate I have no real clue.
1)There is no other side of infinity. Infinity is infinite. If we choose to confuse near infinity with actual infinity, then all bets are off.
2)Minutes are fragile things. Time is mostly conceived by humans due to our feeble state, which consists of taking in energy in higher forms, and using some for our own purposes, and wasting the rest. If we were not bound to this thermodynamic truth regarding our existence, we probably would not have conceived of time to begin with.
Hawking in his book "A Brief History of Time" brings up two or more "arrows" of time which, and it has been years, but one was cosmological and one was thermodynamic.
"Before the big bang" would be before either arrow of time, such that we would understand them. As an observer, where are you? One can conceive thought experiments to solve practical problems without resorting to full blown calculations, but all such experiments I have ever conceived allow for me, to observer, to exist somewhere. You, as an observer, were either in the pre-Big Bang singularity, such that you can report what time looked like (very unlikely) or you were not in existence at all, since there is no place to be outside the Big Bang singularity.
What happened before the big bang is presumed by me to be a nonsensical question, but by no means a dumb question. But, just as I think I have a grasp, I will read something different which seems to indicate I have no real clue.