davesl708
Elite Member
I originally thought I would go Geo for our new house, but everything I was reading indicated that it would not pay off. I believe that a lot now looking at where we are and what a (slightly) more conventional system cost. From what I can see, all the installers jack their prices to account for the tax rebates, so in essence they get it instead of you. Strike 1. Maintenance seems extreme with these a lot of times, though some have had good luck. Strike 2. I heard Econar went out of business suddenly during the crash. They had been around forever, and the bandwagon had gotten huge on this as there was so much buzz about it. That didn't make sense. Strike 3. In the end I realized it was far simpler to put in a natural gas fired on demand water heater for our radiant than to mess with Geo. In my shop I put in a ~90% unit - that was about $1200 total. The radiant tubing and manifold stuff is the same no matter what you do. In our house I went with a more efficient 96% on-demand unit. That was maybe $400-500 more. You can't even come close in the payoff with Geo. Think about how many years it will take to make up the capital cost of Geo with that base cost difference. My 3 bad gas bills were in the $250 range this winter, and that includes an 80x32' shop kept at 60 and a 3500 sf house kept at 65 or so. Both well-insulated.
Think about it and run some numbers before you submit to the Collective. Geo sounds good, but I found the numbers just don't work out. If you believe otherwise, feel free to shoot holes. I will answer to the best I can. No agenda, just what I found to be the case.
My utility cost dropped $200 per month in winter and $100 per month in summer. I also don't have to pay just to have NG hooked up. That saves $300 per year with no usage. Total electric gave me a rate reduction as well. Per my utility company my average cost per day is $3.07. That include a large hot tub that runs 24/7/365.