Z-Michigan
Veteran Member
Redbug said:t seems to me if profit (price) is controlled...the demand would remain about the same. Supplies would be loosened up since there is less profit. Does that make sense or is it flawed? How did Nixon's controls fail? Why didn't it work?
Controlling price would likely increase demand because people would no longer worry about prices increasing. Best case scenario, demand would be unchanged.
Supplies would become erratic because suppliers would only produce and sell when they could make money while selling at the fixed price. If their raw materials fluctuate in price, they will stop production when raw material prices are up, and only produce when material prices are within whatever becomes affordable so they can still make a profit. So supplies will be erratic and shortages will be common. Sounds like gas lines in the 70's huh? (I was born in the 70's so I don't have personal memory of gas lines.)