What I don't understand is why none of the alarmists call for getting the science right and that call is only made by the skeptics.
Alarmists seem to believe Al Gore and the others who say the science is settled in spite of clear evidence of fraud and poor science on the part of the CRU researchers and others. How do they defend the hockey stick, which has been widely discredited, how do they defend the discarding of data in preference to theory in order to "hide the decline"? How do they defend the suppression of studies that don't support their viewpoints?
What is the most abundant greenhouse gas? Not CO2, but water vapor, about which science knows almost nothing. Ah, but they have models! Models built on assumptions since they don't have experiments. And the whole case depends on the validity of these assumptions and a whole bunch of other factors about which they don't fully understand.
Then they ask you to kick in thousands of dollars of your hard earned money to fight a problem that may or may not exist, but their models say it does.
We should all be demanding that they get the science right.