dave1949
Super Star Member
Dave,
I still have alot of reading to catch up to current posts, but I wanted to comment on this.
A couple of years back, we were invited to tour a local wind farm by the engineer who designed and oversaw the build of it for the local power company. He is a neighbor & carpool partner for our supervisor. One thing I found interesting was when he explained the the expected revenues from the wind farm would take ten years longer than the life of the equipment to pay for it. Local regulations require the use of alternative forms of energy for a percentage of their power production so they were installing several wind farms and, I belive, two solar sites even though they would loose money in doing so.
I was going to post pix, but it looks like they are all on my work computer.
There is another poster further on that says an engineer told him the turbines would be paid for in 15-17 years. A lot depends on the wind power viability of the site. Not saying that is the issue in your post. And, I have no way of resolving two knowledgable people's opposing statements. There are countries that are investing heavily in wind power, I have to assume they have valid reasons. I know some are political and some are based on a country's available natural resources. If Russia could hold you hostage by turning off the natural gas pipeline for example, wind power looks real good.
The other aspect is when somebody compares wind or whatever alternative power production costs, to producing power from coal, nothing will beat coal costs from the utility's profit perspective. They paid $X and got $Y worth of marketable energy. Coal is absolutely an energy rich fuel that most other fuels cannot even come close to in up-front production and delivery costs. Real clean coal technology would be one of the best things that could happen. We would still have the mining/extraction issues of environmental degradation like watershed damage and missing mountains.
There are many side effect costs to mining and burning coal above and beyond the delivered per ton price - that are very difficult to put a price tag on. I don't believe those costs don't exist or can be ignored. If you do some reading on environmental and health issues, even putting aside AGW theories, you will get a sense of what I mean.
In the end, it all comes down to what value do different people put on different things, that's what makes it a contentious issue IMO.
Dave.