Global Warming News

[Pilot]

A new paper (Polynomial Cointegration Tests of the Anthropogenic Theory of Global Warming
Michael Beenstock and Yaniv Reingewertz Department of Economics, The Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, ******.) looked at the mathematical analyses of greenhouse gases and found errors in the analytical methods used previously. Although there is a lot of statistician jargon in the paper, the last sentence in the abstract summarizes it well:

"Because the greenhouse effect is temporary rather than permanent, predictions of significant global warming in the 21st century by IPCC are not supported by the data."

In short, the IPCC people are wrong.

 

[IH3444]

Once your credibility comes into question, it's tough to gain it back. This is what the IPCC is fighting now. They have been found inaccurate on several occasions, and data gathering techniques called into question. The emails release didn't help much either for their cause to promote the IPCC agenda.

This is a tactic in a court of law. If you can find, and prove a shread of untruth in witness testimony, then how can you possibly believe them about anything else they testify about? It calls into question all their testimony. All 3000 pages.

It's unraveling for the true believers in GW/CC now. It used to be a subject that was taken seriously by many more folks. Now it is becomming more and more by the day a questionable argument if "global warming", "climate change" is entirely caused by human activity, and not a multitude of other imputs such as solar activity, water vapor, sun spots, ocean currents, orbital variations, volcanos, cosmic rays, tooting termites.....Scientists want to be listen to and taken dead seriously. Now the IPCC report is becoming a bit of a subject to bash, make light hearteness of, and skewer with humor. Hardly what the writers of the 3000 page document wanted. Banter for late night TV talk show host staffs to write jokes about. Everytime one of these articles comes out about part of the report being questioned....

Variations in climate on the earth was going on for 100s of millions of years before humans and their SUVs.

But all of this is academic, and some good and bad arguments. The way we are headed now, especially this comming November is shaping up like a complete reversal of the present course on this subject.

I for one am about completely tired of snow. Plowing it, FELing it, blowing it, shoveling it. Chipping ice. I wish it would warm up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...rofessors-amazing-climate-change-retreat.html

 

[EddieWalker]

Again and again, if you want to find out the real news of what's going on in our country, you have to go to the British papers. Our media doesn't have any credibility anymore and is a total waste of time.

While the British were in the lead on Global Warming, their press is doing what ours is not. They are investigating all of it and coming up with story after story about the false science, the lies and the corruption. It's almost a joke now, but for some reason that I don't understand, there are still those who want to believe. I can't figure it out, but the numbers are turning and the polls are showing that its no longer a real concern for those of us who have been fightint it over the past decade.

Here's another story that just adds to the absurdity of Man Made Global Warming.

World may not be warming, say scientists - Times Online

Just one paragraph from the article;

“The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change,” said John Christy, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a former lead author on the IPCC.

Eddie

 

[Pilot]

If you read the reference that Eddie gave, at the end of the article there is still an assertion by some that the world is warming faster than they thought--the result of interviewing people from both sides of the issue, something the US press doesn't do in regard to global warming.

But, the person interviewed, Dr Vicky Pope, doesn't defend the data set--she can't--all she says is that things are still warming. She is using the faulty database that Christy & Watts, also quoted in the story, criticized.

Watch what happens in the press on the global warming issue. If it is all discredited, the press will just stop reporting on it. Unless there is a big scandal, you won't hear much about it all being wrong, you'll just stop hearing about it. That's what happened with the "Population Bomb", "The Limits to Growth" and other issues over the last 30-40 years.

I found it interesting that in the President's State of the Union speech that when he mentioned global warming there was some laughter among the members of congress and as he tried to proceed, the laughter got louder and he got flustered and ended up grinning himself. It was like they all knew the issue had been discredited but politically they had to deal with it. Just my guess.

 

[Pilot]

Eddie, here's another one from the Times Online (Obviously not the NY Times):

Feb. 15 (London time):

"UN must investigate warming 礎ias? says former climate chief"
"Every error exaggerated the impact of change"

UN must investigate warming ‘bias’, says former climate chief - Times Online

And some excerpts:

"The UN body that advises world leaders on climate change must investigate an apparent bias in its report that resulted in several exaggerations of the impact of global warming, according to its former chairman."

"In an interview with The Times Robert Watson said that all the errors exposed so far in the report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) resulted in overstatements of the severity of the problem."

"Professor Watson... said that if the errors had just been innocent mistakes, as has been claimed by the current chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, some would probably have understated the impact of climate change."

?..The mistakes all appear to have gone in the direction of making it seem like climate change is more serious by overstating the impact. That is worrying. The IPCC needs to look at this trend in the errors and ask why it happened.

展e should always be challenged by sceptics, he said. 典he IPCC痴 job is to weigh up the evidence. If it can稚 be dismissed, it should be included in the report. Point out it痴 in the minority and, if you can稚 say why it痴 wrong, just say it痴 a different view.

 

[IH3444]

Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Mail Online

Lesons from a real pro, it's a teaching moment...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Flim-Flam_Man

 

[Cat_Driver]

This Global warming this is a bunch of Hooie.

Look how they take readings - This will water your eyes. They take temp reading near exhaust fans from air conditioners, hot asphalt, traffis, and cement building that retain heat.

Watts Up With That?: weather_stations Archives

Further more for you old timers like me remember Global cooling, remember we were all supposed to be frozen by now.

Anyway look at this article:

http://www.denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

Here's the twist no one is talking about. These scientists used data back to the cave men era to say we would have global coolin, now this new set of scientists take THE EXACT SAME DATA from the stone age and say we have Global warming. Come on people you can't use the same data and have two polar opposite opinions.


I didn't buy the Global cooling as a kid and I don't buy global warming as an old man.

 

[mffarmall]

I'm not going to go out and hug a tree unless I've been drinking. But I like the idea of getting my gas from Ohio and having a farmer not sure what to do with the extra money he has. I also like recycling because it can be. If I want to know what my power bill will be then I can check my solar panels out put.

 

[keegs]

I'm not going to go out and hug a tree unless I've been drinking. But I like the idea of getting my gas from Ohio and having a farmer not sure what to do with the extra money he has. I also like recycling because it can be. If I want to know what my power bill will be then I can check my solar panels out put.

here here!!

 

[keegs]

I hear the republicans and the coal industry have a new slogan bumper sticker:

The War On Coal