Global Warming?

Status
Not open for further replies.
/ Global Warming? #1,382  
Guess I should have quoted Coulter's whole rant: "...It's used to kill bacteria in food and treat cancer."

Yup, time to load up the bus to Fukushima.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,385  
The ultimate - "Radiation is good for you." - Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter is right without the suns light (radiation) there is no life on earth.

HS
 
/ Global Warming? #1,386  
The ultimate - "Radiation is good for you." - Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter is right without the suns light (radiation) there is no life on earth.

HS

Gosh. It makes me wonder, then, why did the Japanese gov't move all those people away from the melting nuclear power plants?

Sounds like the right move is to get a solar panel and soak up all the free radiation. Got any ideas on how to eliminate the unwanted caesium and iodine?

th


Got tuna?
 
/ Global Warming? #1,388  
Gosh. It makes me wonder, then, why did the Japanese gov't move all those people away from the melting nuclear power plants?

Sounds like the right move is to get a solar panel and soak up all the free radiation. Got any ideas on how to eliminate the unwanted caesium and iodine?

th


Got tuna?

Moderation in all things, including radiation. No use to overdo.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,389  
Mutation speeds evolution.
larry

In populations where the generations roll pretty quickly, one would think that the number one adaptation being bolstered is the individual's ability to repair it's own DNA.
No mutation necessary, just making the best at DNA repair the dominant individuals due to massive genetic pressure of the radiation insult. It would be a bit like what the plague did to the Europeans...many of those folks left were immune to the plague, but the plague didn't make them immune, it made them prominent in the population. Many of the immune are immune to AIDS, which gave the researches the plague M.O. as a partial indicator to understand the point of action of the AIDS virus.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,392  
Having some no mind spouting the party line on every subject, to me seems stupid Quit picking on George Bush, he was the one that promoted wind power the most. Look it up.

Do you mean the "Clear Skies Initiative" he signed off on that gave polluters the right to pollute more or the clear cutting of our forests here in Oregon? I don't mean to pick on George, but he could have better than Cheney.

The point, however, is not about Bush and his policies, it's about the quality of your life and mine - in spite of the perceived differences we appear to have.

My perspective is what's good for you and good for me makes us both stronger to face down those who desire to cheat either of us.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,394  
Warmest U.S. spring on record - NOAA

WASHINGTON, June 7 (Reuters) - So far, 2012 has been the warmest year the United States has ever seen, with the warmest spring and the second-warmest May since record-keeping began in 1895, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported on Thursday.

Temperatures for the past 12 months and the year-to-date have been the warmest on record for the contiguous United States, NOAA said.

The average temperature for the contiguous 48 states for meteorological spring, which runs from March t hrough May, was 57.1 degrees F (13.9 C), 5.2 degrees (2.9 C) above the 20th century long-term average and 2 degrees F (1.1 C) warmer than the previous warmest spring in 1910.

Record warmth and near-record warmth blanketed the eastern two-thirds of the country from this spring, with 31 states reporting record warmth for the season and 11 more with spring temperatures among their 10 warmest.

"The Midwest and the upper Midwest were the epicenters for this vast warmth," Deke Arndt of NOAA's Climatic Data Center said in an online video. That meant farming started earlier in the year, and so did pests and weeds, bringing higher costs earlier in the growing season, Arndt said.

"This warmth is an example of what we would expect to see more often in a warming world," Arndt said.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,395  
You understand, of course, that there is no safe level of radiation?
There is background radiation on Earth. Radioactive decay keeps the interior hot. The exposure level is low and its net effect on life is probably benign due mild mutagenic effects spurring evolution.
larry
 
/ Global Warming? #1,396  
In Texas when a billionaire wanted to pump radio active waist threw the aquifer. They just had the map redrawn and the aquifer moved. Problem solved.
Those Billionaires are out there to help us they will tell us how to vote and what is good for us, all we have to do is listen.
The S&P 500 had record profits and the top 1% made record income soon, real soon it will trickle down and everything will be perfect.
I can see the light in some areas it could be the forest fires they will go out in the fall, Maybe.
You have to believe those Billionaires pay a lot of people to teach us the proper way to think on these sites. Be sure you thank them, and vote how they tell you, they are looking out for you best interests. You all know that.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,397  
Sounds like a DRAW to me.....

Alaska's spring months were 2.7 degrees F (1.5 C) cooler than average and 10.5 percent wetter and snowier, while drought spread over Hawaii, though exceptional drought was eliminated across the island state.

However, there was more ice cover in the Arctic in May 2012 than in May 2011, the center said on Wednesday on its website nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/ . There was heavy ice in the Bering Sea, but unusually low ice extent in the Barents and Kara Seas.
 
/ Global Warming? #1,399  
...about 43 per cent of Earth's land surface has been converted to agricultural or urban use.

Forty three percent is cropping, cruising, parking, and roofing? Add a some strip mining, deserts expanding, forests burning, glaciers melting, wars, and what could possibly go wrong?
 
/ Global Warming? #1,400  
EE Bota: You understand, of course, that your statement has little practical value.

Henh and there I was thinking I was prescient.

SPYDERLK, thanks for the clarification.

Do you know how many people die of the thing that killed them 20 years later?

Well, the Japanese probably have a web site with the stats from our atom bombs and I'll bet the casualties past and present run into the millions. Read somewhere about how many US troops, used as lab rats, died of cancers after testing the dang things, too.

Not long ago I read a background piece of casualties from Chernobyl and it seems the casualty numbers go from the absurd to the fantastic - nature of our times I suppose, but woefully depressing, nevertheless. Especially since Chernobyl fall out was killing Colorado deer deep in the wilderness. This beautiful Pacific Northwest is inundated with Fukushima fallout. Who do I thank?

I was surprised, when researching how long the human body could live, that more than a few sites supported 125 years. There seems to be nothing on the cause of why not now, but my take on the matter is that it has more to do with the chemicals coursing through our bodies from our food, water and air. Heard a radio guy say he had his blood tested and there were some 180+ foreign chemicals in his blood. Another sign of our times, I suppose.

Anyway, if I don't want a man-made/manipulated deadly substance to pollute my body, my family and/or anybody else, it would only be polite to allow me and everybody else to "just say no!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Marketplace Items

2001 INTERNATIONAL 4700 BOX TRUCK (A59906)
2001 INTERNATIONAL...
2012 BMW 328i Coupe (A61569)
2012 BMW 328i...
2005 Chevrolet Impala Sedan (A56859)
2005 Chevrolet...
2023 Kubota BX1880V-1 Sub - Compact Utility Tractor with 54-Inch Mower Deck (A61307)
2023 Kubota...
USC Series 2000 Conveyor (A61307)
USC Series 2000...
2020 MACK GRANITE (A60736)
2020 MACK GRANITE...
 
Top