prairiegirl
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2020
- Messages
- 60
- Tractor
- John Deere 2950, 7200, Kubota, MF
What does one of these gas can flame arrestor look like?
I had to look that up too, but it is some kind of screen. Won't pour any faster, likely
What does one of these gas can flame arrestor look like?
Well first you have to have a teacher with common sense. They come at a premium.^^^^ yes indeed
The gas cans thing is crazy. Another in the long list of things that schools should consider teaching. Like how about a class in “common sense”?
Just think of the money scurrying across that border.
That’s why it’s wide open.
Actually, we have significant resources arrayed along our Southern Border - hard working agents armed with various 'high tech' apparatus.to secure the southern border where this drug is being walked in backpacks across every day
That will be a shock when someone pours a glass of water out of it.What is a flame arrestor on a gas can?
A flame arrestor is a small device, similar to a mesh screen, in the nozzle of the can. The screen helps prevent vapors in the gasoline container from igniting. Such a device is required on metal gas cans. Required on metal cans already and about to be required on plastic cans.
Don't quote me but one of my gas cans is a 6 gal water can. I see no difference. It looks and works like a gas can. I installed a vent like my other cans and it was cheaper than a gas can and it held more fuel... so I've been using it for about 8 years. Oh - it's blue.
“We all see…..”. You get to speak for all of us??So Mossie gets to mention the governmental authority of the Federal agency, the (EPA) and comment on them and their actions but my two posts with articles from groups aligned in a non-partisan way with ranchers and landowners challenging the overreach of the EPA gets deleted because "political". We all see the double standard in action almost daily around here.
So here is another attempt to show an area where the EPD should be rebalanced to do the job it was intended to do without getting way past reasonable like they have with the fuel cans issue. This is not a political issue - people on both sides own property and are involved with the Farm Bureau and other organizations which oppose the EPA over reach on the WOTUS rules.
Ag Groups File Lawsuit to Challenge EPA's "Vague" New WOTUS Definition
Farm Bureau's Duvall says the rule puts farmers and ranchers in a position where they will have to hire lawyers and consultants to establish the boundaries of farming.www.drovers.com
Wow! Things get looney real fast, eh?No, they are not worrying about nothing.
First, there's the additional cost involved.
Next could be the "mandate" that requires them for all fuel cans.
Then, there will be the mandatory surrender of any non-compliant ones.
Then, there will be the "show proof of ownership" requirement before being granted a permit to purchase fuel in a container. But, only after the appropriate background check and 8 hour safety course which will set you back $150.
Then will come the "ban" on bump stocks and arm braces.
Oh wait, they already did that last one . . .
Complacency leads to enslavement.
To all of you who were revolted by this flame arrestor business, thanks. Freedom is precious. Even if it is the freedom to 'endanger' your life by using a fuel can!
By the way, how many of you have purchased real cold medicine or Parepectolin lately?
Drugs & Medications
Well, actually, we need define the term. After all, if the 'sense' was indeed 'common,' it wouldn't command a 'premium' price - now, would it?Well first you have to have a teacher with common sense. They come at a premium.