MikeD74T
Veteran Member
Oh gosh, I'm digging a hole! What I am trying to say is that I personally think that when crooks have easy access to more potent force it's a bad recipe.
The motor vehicle argument has no relation as my point is related to crooks having acces.
Anyhow, I should not have posted, sorry.
jimmyj, First I apologize for offending you, it was/is not my intent. Your opinion has as much value as anyone else's. I made the automobile reference to point out that figures can be skewed. With more proximity to a hazard risk & incidence increases. Violent crime increases with proximity to criminals. Criminals by definition use commonplace items (cars, guns, bricks, unexploded munitions) & methods against society. As ultimately futile as crime is, criminals generally believe the biggest stick wins. Guns are pretty much the biggest stick available today. But eliminating guns removes only one criminal option, removing criminals removes crime.
texasjohn, Most state highways get federal money, should the state be able to post no legal firearms on the roadways?
I work at a nuclear power plant. There is a specific federal statute prohibiting "weapons" in the plant. "Weapons" is also very specifically defined along with allowances for deviation. e.i. I can't bring a 10" knife from home to sharpen it in the machine shop, but can bring the same knife if needed to prepare a on site meal for my crew. The difference is simply notifying my boss & the security dept. As for private businesses, I'll continue to carry concealed because worst they can do is ask me to leave. N.H. law allows open carry which would simply incite those business owners to ask me to leave sooner. In either case I'd just do business elsewhere.
"Weapons" side story. Nearby is beach resort town. Some residents were complaining that a couple of beach shops were selling martial arts weapons & opined the town should outlaw those sales. This same town filed a cease & desist order on a college kid giving free pedicab rides without a peddlers license! The town reps actually referenced not wanting to go up against the NRA over articles that, although offensive to some, are not statistically part of criminal activity and left the shops alone. I doubt an archery shop would raise eyebrows at the beach despite the lethal potential. The college kid was committing a crime, the martial arts shop owners were not. MikeD74T